Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 15, 2026

Microarray-based Identification of Individual HERV Loci Expression: Application to Biomarker Discovery in Prostate Cancer
Published on: November 2, 2013
Prognostic Implications of Very High Decipher Scores in Prostate Cancer: Towards a Refined Genomic Risk
Rohan Sharma1, Marcio C Moschovas1, Seetharam K R Bhatt2
1Global Robotics Institute, AdventHealth, Celebration, FL, USA.
Background And Objective:
The 22-gene Decipher genomic classifier (DGC) is validated for risk stratification in prostate cancer. Our aim was to evaluate the association of a novel very high-risk (VHR) group (DGC score >0.85) with recurrence outcomes after radical prostatectomy (RP) and to assess the impact of integrating DGC scores with Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment Postsurgical (CAPRA-S) scores and European Association of Urology (EAU) biochemical recurrence (BCR) risk groups on prognostication.
Methods:
We retrospectively analyzed data for 1673 patients who underwent RP (2015 and 2022). DGC scores were categorized as low risk (<0.45), intermediate (0.45-0.60), high (0.61-0.85), or VHR (>0.85). BCR was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank tests. DGC scores were combined with CAPRA-S scores, and separately with EAU BCR risk groups to assess associations with BCR. Associations between DGC scores and adverse pathological features were also evaluated.
Key Findings And Limitations:
Among the 1673 men who underwent RP, the incidence of adverse pathological features (International Society of Urological Pathology grade group ≥4, pT3b/T4, or pN1) increased with increasing DGC score (p < 0.001). DGC VHR was an independent predictor of BCR (hazard ratio 1.70, 95% confidence interval 1.26-2.52; p = 0.008). DGC scores further refined risk stratification within the EAU BCR and CAPRA-S risk groups. Decision curve analysis showed that combining DGC scores with CAPRA-S scores or EAU risk groups yielded a greater net benefit in comparison to using each model alone across the risk threshold range from 0.18 to 0.50. The retrospective, single-institution nature of the study highlights the need for external validation.
Conclusion And Clinical Implications:
A DGC score >0.85 delineates a distinct subgroup with markedly adverse oncologic outcomes. Recognition of this VHR category refines postoperative assessment and supports personalized adjuvant or salvage therapy.
More Related Videos
08:05Detection and Isolation of Cancer in Prostate Biopsies Using Stimulated Raman Histology and Artificial Intelligence
Published on: June 10, 2025
06:08A Cognitive Fusion-guided Prostate Biopsy Using Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transrectal Ultrasound
Published on: March 21, 2025