Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 15, 2026

Rapid Diagnosis of Avian Influenza Virus in Wild Birds: Use of a Portable rRT-PCR and Freeze-dried Reagents in the Field
Published on: August 2, 2011
A systematic review of mathematical and machine learning models of Avian Influenza
Shixun Huang1,2, Nicola Luigi Bragazzi3, Zahra Movahedi Nia1,4,5,6
1Artificial Intelligence & Mathematical Modeling Lab (AIMM Lab), Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, 155 College St, Room 500, Toronto, ON M5T 3M7, Canada.
Abstract:
Avian influenza (AI) is a highly transmissible disease with significant implications for public health, agriculture, and global food security. Mathematical, statistical, and machine learning-based models play a crucial role in understanding AI dynamics, predicting outbreaks, and evaluating intervention strategies. This systematic review assesses existing modeling approaches, categorizing studies into mathematical and statistical models, machine learning-based models, and hybrid models, with a focus on their applications in risk assessment, outbreak prediction, dynamic modeling, and parameter estimation. Following the PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase. The search strategy included machine learning-related terms combined with modeling approaches such as compartmental models (e.g., SEIR, SIR), statistical methods, machine learning algorithms (e.g., SVM, Random Forest, XGBoost), and hybrid frameworks. A total of 43 studies met the inclusion criteria: 26 (60.47 %) used mathematical/statistical models, 12 (27.91 %) used machine learning models, and 5 (11.63 %) employed hybrid models. Among mathematical/statistical models, 50 % addressed transmission dynamics, while machine learning models primarily focused on risk assessment (50 %) and outbreak prediction (41.67 %). Hybrid models, though less prevalent, contributed to enhanced prediction accuracy and understanding of transmission. However, validation remains inconsistent, with 25.58 % of mathematical/statistical models lacking explicit validation. Sensitivity analysis and numerical simulations dominate mathematical and statistical model validation, whereas machine learning studies commonly use F1-score, confusion matrices, and external validation datasets. Persistent challenges include limited generalizability of datasets, inconsistency in validation protocols, and high computational costs. This review highlights the need for enhanced data sharing, integration of environmental and real-time information, standardized validation methods, and further development of hybrid approaches to strengthen model reliability and improve the prediction and control of future AI outbreaks.
More Related Videos
09:07Using Zebrafish Models of Human Influenza A Virus Infections to Screen Antiviral Drugs and Characterize Host Immune Cell Responses
Published on: January 20, 2017
12:09Avian Influenza Surveillance with FTA Cards: Field Methods, Biosafety, and Transportation Issues Solved
Published on: August 2, 2011
Related Concept Videos
Viral Mutations
Steps in Outbreak Investigation