Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 6, 2026

Cutoff Value of Phase Angle by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis at Admission as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Acute Heart Failure
Published on: June 10, 2025
Prognostic value of glycaemic variability for mortality in cardiogenic shock patients: a retrospective cohort study
1Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, NO.1 Youyi Road, Yuzhong District, Chongqing, 400016, China.
Insights
Glycaemic variability (GV) predicts mortality in cardiogenic shock (CS) patients. Higher GV is linked to increased 30-day, 90-day, and 360-day mortality, particularly in non-diabetic individuals, highlighting glucose control importance.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Endocrinology
- Intensive Care Medicine
Background:
- Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a critical condition with high mortality.
- Effective glycemic management is vital for CS patient outcomes.
- Glycemic variability (GV) is linked to adverse outcomes in various diseases, but its role in CS is unclear.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate if GV independently predicts all-cause mortality in intensive care unit (ICU) admitted CS patients.
- To assess the prognostic implications of GV in the CS population.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective cohort study using the MIMIC-IV 3.0 database.
- Included 2335 CS patients, with external validation in the eICU 2.0 database.
- Analyzed 30-day, 90-day, and 360-day all-cause mortality after ICU admission.
Main Results:
- Higher GV quartiles were associated with increased 30-day, 90-day, and 360-day mortality in CS patients.
- Multivariate analysis confirmed higher GV quartiles independently predicted increased mortality risk (e.g., Q4 vs. Q1 for 360-day mortality: HR=1.323).
- GV's association with mortality was significant in non-diabetic patients but not in diabetic patients.
Conclusions:
- Glycemic variability (GV) is a significant predictor of mortality in non-diabetic CS patients.
- GV can aid in risk stratification and guide interventions for non-diabetic CS patients.
- Emphasizes the importance of stable blood glucose control in managing CS patients.
Background:
Cardiogenic shock (CS) represents a life-threatening cardiovascular condition with high mortality rates. Effective glycaemic management plays a critical role in treating CS patients. Glycaemic variability (GV), an increasingly recognized indicator of glycaemic control, has demonstrated significant associations with adverse outcomes across various disease. The prognostic implications of GV specifically in CS remain unclear. We investigated whether GV independently predicts all-cause mortality following ICU admission in this patient population.
Methods:
This retrospective cohort study analyzed data from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV 3.0 (MIMIC-IV 3.0) database, focusing on patients with CS. The study endpoints were 30-day, 90-day, and 360-day all-cause mortality after ICU admission. The external validation was performed in eICU 2.0 database.
Results:
From 2008 to 2022, we enrolled 2335 CS patients from the MIMIC-IV 3.0 database in this study, the mean (SD) age of this cohort was 69.81 (14.29) years, 1413 (60.51%) were male. CS patients in higher GV quartiles had higher 30-day (31.7% vs. 36.1% vs. 37.8% vs. 47.3%, p < 0.001), 90-day (38.8% vs. 43.0% vs. 48.5% vs. 53.9%, p < 0.001), and 360-day (44.6% vs. 49.8% vs. 57.3% vs. 63.0%, p < 0.001) all-cause mortality. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards models revealed that higher GV quartiles were associated with higher risk of 30-day (Q4 vs. Q1: HR = 1.260, 95% CI 1.031, 1.540, p = 0.024), 90-day (Q4 vs. Q1: HR = 1.235, 95% CI 1.028, 1.485, p = 0.024), and 360-day (Q4 vs. Q1: HR = 1.323, 95% CI 1.115, 1.570, p = 0.001) all-cause mortality. Subgroup analysis revealed that the effect of GV was consistent across most subgroups except in patients with and without diabetes. In patients without diabetes, GV was associated with a significantly elevated risk of mortality, whereas no significant association was observed in patients with diabetes. Similarly, in 1100 CS patients from eICU 2.0 database reached similar findings that higher GV quartiles were associated with higher risk of in-ICU (Q4 vs. Q1: HR = 2.611, 95% CI 1.613, 4.226, p < 0.001) and in-hospital (Q4 vs. Q1: HR = 2.104, 95% CI 1.396, 3.171, p < 0.001) all-cause mortality.
Conclusion:
GV is a significant predictor of 30-day, 90-day, and 360-day all-cause mortality after ICU admission in non-diabetic CS patients. GV may serve as a valuable marker for risk stratification and guiding subsequent interventions in CS non-diabetic patients, which emphasized the importance of stable control of blood glucose.
More Related Videos
07:22Glycemic Impact on Knee Osteoarthritis Symptoms on Physical, Radiographic, and Inflammatory Markers among Individuals Aged 50 and Over with Diabetes
Published on: March 7, 2025
08:14Author Spotlight: Developing Innovative Therapeutic Strategies for Hemorrhagic Shock Research
Published on: March 22, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Diabetes Mellitus: Type 2 and Gestational
Peripheral Arterial Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Evaluation
Hypoglycemia and Glucagon
Heart Failure III: Clinical Manifestations