Sacrococcygeal Pilonidal Sinus Disease: A Decade-In-Review of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures
Munyaradzi G Nyandoro1,2, Mary M K Teoh3, Ellen G Maclean3
1The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.
Background:
Sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus disease (SPD) is a chronic inflammatory condition that can significantly impact quality of life. While recurrence and surgical site infection (SSI) rates are well documented, less is known about how different surgical techniques affect patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).
Methods:
This study employed mixed methods, including standardised mail questionnaires and telephone interviews (May-September 2020), to conduct a multi-centre retrospective decade follow-up review of definitive SPD surgery participants from Western Australia. Six surgical technique groups were analysed: Karydakis flap (KF), modified Karydakis flap (MKF), Limberg flap (LF), modified Limberg flap (MLF), other flap techniques (OFT) and secondary intention healing techniques (SIT). PROMs assessed included body image, cosmesis, confidence, functional recovery and overall satisfaction-secondary outcomes examined recurrence, SSI and other complications.
Results:
A total of 136 patients met the inclusion criteria. MLF and OFT achieved the fastest functional recovery, with median return-to-work times of 14 and 21 days, respectively, compared to 60 days for SIT (p = 0.007). MKF and LF achieved the highest body image and cosmetic satisfaction scores (medians of 20 and 19), whereas SIT and OFT scored the lowest. MKF yielded the highest overall satisfaction (100%). SIT was associated with the highest recurrence rate (52.2%) and SSI rates (30.4%), while MLF and MKF combined had low recurrence rates with favourable PROMs.
Conclusion:
Flap-based techniques, particularly the MKF and MLF, offer an optimal balance of functional recovery, cosmetic outcomes and low recurrence rates. Incorporating PROMs into SPD surgical planning can better align treatment with patient priorities and the underlying pathophysiology of the disease.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Irritable Bowel Syndrome II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Evaluation
Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) is classified into subtypes based on the predominant bowel habits as determined by the Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS). The subtypes are:
Assessment of the Gastrointestinal System II: Health Perception Pattern
Health Perception Patterns
Health perception patterns offer valuable insights into a patient's lifestyle habits and how they may impact their GI health. These patterns include:
Assessment of the Gastrointestinal System I: Subjective Data
Health History
The initial step in assessing the GI system is obtaining a comprehensive health history. This includes inquiring about the patient's history or presence of problems...


