Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

99.7K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. 
99.7K
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies01:27

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

573
Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This...
573
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

1.3K
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
1.3K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

14.3K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
14.3K
One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes01:15

One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes

4.0K
One-Way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples with equal or unequal sample sizes. When one-way ANOVA is performed on two datasets with samples of equal sizes, it can be easily observed that the computed F statistic is highly sensitive to the sample mean.
Different sample means can result in different values for the variance estimate: variance between samples. This is because the variance between samples is calculated as the product of the sample size and the variance between the...
4.0K
Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation01:22

Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation

8.8K
In practice, we rarely know the population standard deviation. In the past, when the sample size was large, this did not present a problem to statisticians. They used the sample standard deviation s as an estimate for σ and proceeded as before to calculate a confidence interval with close enough results. However, statisticians ran into problems when the sample size was small. A small sample size caused inaccuracies in the confidence interval.
William S. Gosset (1876–1937) of the...
8.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Survival Analysis Under the Aalen's Additive Hazards Model With Covariate Measurement Error: Application to Causal Mediation Analysis.

Statistics in medicine·2025
Same author

Mediation Analysis With Exposure-Mediator Interaction and Covariate Measurement Error Under the Additive Hazards Model.

Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift·2025
Same author

Multicategory matched learning for estimating optimal individualized treatment rules in observational studies with application to a hepatocellular carcinoma study.

Statistical methods in medical research·2025
Same author

Tempol, a Superoxide Dismutase Mimetic, Inhibits Wallerian Degeneration Following Spinal Cord Injury by Preventing Glutathione Depletion and Aldose Reductase Activation.

Journal of neurotrauma·2024
Same author

Consistent inverse probability of treatment weighted estimation of the average treatment effect with mismeasured time-dependent confounders.

Statistics in medicine·2022
Same author

Role of the Polyol Pathway in Locomotor Recovery and Wallerian Degeneration after Spinal Cord Contusion Injury.

Neurotrauma reports·2021
Same journal

Optimal Weighted Tests for Replication Studies and the 'Two-Trials Rule' With Multiple Hypotheses.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Identifiable Copula-Double-Cox Models: A Fully Parametric Framework for Dependent Right-Censored Survival Data.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Moving From Individualized Risk-Based Prevention to Benefit-Based Prevention: Estimating Individualized Life-Years Gained From Prevention Services as a Basis for Eligibility.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

A Mixture of Distributed Lag Non-Linear Models to Account for Spatially Heterogeneous Exposure-Lag-Response Associations.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Practical Considerations for Gaussian Process Modeling for Causal Inference in Quasi-Experimental Studies With Panel Data.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Covariate Adjustment for Wilcoxon Two Sample Statistic and Test.

Statistics in medicine·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 15, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

15.0K

Covariate Balancing With Measurement Error.

Xialing Wen1, Ying Yan1

  • 1School of Mathematics, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.

Statistics in Medicine
|October 11, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Measurement error in covariates can worsen imbalance and bias treatment effect estimates. This study introduces correction strategies to improve covariate balancing methods, successfully recovering balance and eliminating bias in simulations and real data.

Keywords:
average treatment effectcausal inferencecovariate balancing propensity scoreentropy balancingmeasurement error correction

More Related Videos

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.5K
Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data
06:35

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data

Published on: July 24, 2010

17.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 15, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

15.0K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.5K
Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data
06:35

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data

Published on: July 24, 2010

17.3K

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Epidemiology
  • Causal Inference

Background:

  • Covariate balancing methods are crucial for causal inference in observational studies.
  • These methods assume accurate covariate measurement, a condition often unmet due to measurement error.
  • The impact of measurement error on covariate balancing and treatment effect estimation is not well understood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the effects of unaddressed measurement error on covariate balancing methods.
  • To propose novel measurement error correction strategies for existing balancing techniques.
  • To demonstrate the effectiveness of these corrected methods in mitigating bias and improving covariate balance.

Main Methods:

  • Theoretical analysis of measurement error impact on covariate balancing.
  • Development of a class of measurement error correction strategies.
  • Simulation studies to evaluate performance under various error scenarios.
  • Application to real-world observational data.

Main Results:

  • Ignoring measurement error exacerbates covariate imbalance and introduces bias.
  • Proposed correction strategies effectively balance covariates even with measurement error.
  • Treatment effect estimation bias is eliminated by the proposed methods.
  • Simulations and real data analysis confirm the theoretical findings.

Conclusions:

  • Measurement error is a critical issue that must be addressed in covariate balancing.
  • The proposed correction strategies offer a robust solution for handling mismeasured covariates.
  • This work advances causal inference methods by providing tools to improve the reliability of observational studies.