Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 15, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
Covariate Balancing With Measurement Error
1School of Mathematics, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Abstract:
In recent years, there is a growing body of causal inference literature focusing on covariate balancing methods. These methods eliminate observed confounding by equalizing covariate moments between the treated and control groups. The validity of covariate balancing relies on an implicit assumption that all covariates are accurately measured, which is frequently violated in observational studies. Nevertheless, the impact of measurement error on covariate balancing is unclear, and there is no existing work on balancing mismeasured covariates adequately. In this article, we show that naively ignoring measurement error reversely increases the magnitude of covariate imbalance and induces bias to treatment effect estimation. We then propose a class of measurement error correction strategies for the existing covariate balancing methods. Theoretically, we show that these strategies successfully recover balance for all covariates and eliminate bias of treatment effect estimation. We assess the proposed correction methods in simulation studies and real data analysis.
Related Concept Videos
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Random and Systematic Errors
One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes
Different sample means can result in different values for the variance estimate: variance between samples. This is because the variance between samples is calculated as the product of the sample size and the variance between the...
Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation
William S. Gosset (1876–1937) of the...

