Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 15, 2026

Vessel-sparing Excision and Primary Anastomosis
Published on: January 7, 2019
Outcomes Following Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury: Is There a Difference Between Subtypes in the Short Term?
Charlotte Emma Chant1, Martino Zacche2, Ilias Giarenis3
1Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University Hospitals Dorset, Royal Bournemouth Hospital, Castle Lane East, Bournemouth, BH7 7DW, UK. charlotte.chant@nhs.net.
Introduction And Hypothesis:
Obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASI) affect 2.9% of vaginal births and are associated with significant morbidity (Dudding et al. Ann Surg 247(2):224-237). Our objective was to evaluate if women sustaining minor OASI (3a) experience less pelvic floor dysfunction compared to major OASI (3b, 3c and 4).
Methods:
In a tertiary Urogynaecology centre, patients were followed-up in a perineal clinic, with data regarding clinical outcomes recorded prospectively between 2011 and 2023. Patients graded bowel and urinary symptoms on a scale of 0-4. Pelvic floor muscle (PFM) strength, squeeze on per rectal (PR) examination and a Pescatori score were assigned by clinicians. Scores were retrospectively compared between minor and major tear groups. Statistical analysis was conducted using the chi-squared test for symptom scores and Mann-Whitney U test for PFM strength, Pescatori score and PR squeeze.
Results:
Data were complete for 1327 of 1455 women: 639 minor and 688 major tears. The majority of patients were asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic, 3 months postpartum, in respect to faecal passive incontinence, flatal incontinence and urinary symptoms with no difference between groups. There was no significant difference in Pescatori score, PFM strength or PR squeeze. There was a statistically significant difference between groups for faecal urgency (2.8% vs 5.1%, p = 0.0045) and faecal urgency incontinence (0.2% vs 1.2% p = 0.003).
Conclusions:
Women sustaining minor OASI are less likely to experience faecal urgency and urgency incontinence than following major OASI. There was no significant difference for all other outcomes. Prospective studies using validated questionnaires with long-term follow-up are required to confirm our findings.
More Related Videos
04:33Spinal Hernia Repair and Cauda Equina Repositioning After Lumbar Decompression under Three-Dimensional Microscopy: A Case Report and Literature Review
Published on: November 8, 2024
03:25Transcorporal Artificial Urinary Sphincter Cuff Placement in a Case Requiring Revision for Urethral Atrophy
Published on: June 16, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...
Inflammatory Bowel Disease V: Surgical Management
Here are some common surgical interventions for IBD:
Aneurysm IV: Nursing Management
Assessment of the Rectum and Anus
Rectal Inspection
Begin by inspecting the perianal and anal areas for color, texture, rashes,...
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Epidural Anesthesia
Since epidural anesthetics can be infused through an epidural catheter, all types of drugs, including short-acting ones, can be administered. Chloroprocaine and lidocaine are examples of short and long-duration anesthetics, respectively. Bupivacaine...
Peptic Ulcer Disease V: Surgical Management and Nursing Care
Surgical Interventions for Peptic Ulcer Disease