Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 26, 2026
Intense Pulsed Light for the Treatment of Dry Eye Owing to Meibomian Gland Dysfunction
Published on: April 1, 2019
"Stepwise Extension Treatment Protocol" versus "Pro Re Nata Regimen" of Intense Pulsed Light for Meibomian Gland
Hyunmin Ahn1, Jae Lim Chung1, Ikhyun Jun2
1Share Bright Vision Eye Clinic, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Purpose:
To compare the efficacy of a stepwise extension treatment (SET) protocol and a pro re nata (PRN) regimen of intense pulsed light (IPL) therapy with warm compresses for meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD).
Design:
A prospective, comparative study.
Participants:
Participants with meibomian gland expressibility (MGE) or meibum quality (MQ) grade 2 or higher.
Methods:
All participants initially received 4 IPL sessions at 4-week intervals. In the SET group, intervals were extended or shortened by 2 weeks based on clinical response. In the PRN group, re-treatment was performed only when predefined criteria were met. Re-treatment was indicated if the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) was ≥23 or increased from the prior visit, along with MGE or MQ ≥2. A linear mixed-effects model (LMM) was used for analysis.
Main Outcome Measures:
The primary outcome measures were the longitudinal changes in the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI), meibomian gland expressibility (MGE), and meibum quality (MQ). The total number of IPL sessions administered from baseline to 24 months was assessed as a secondary outcome.
Results:
Among 412 participants, 308 (74.8 %) completed the study. Mean changes in OSDI, MGE, and MQ from baseline to 24 months were -16.0, -0.8, and -0.9 in the SET group and -15.3, -0.7, and -0.8 in the PRN group, respectively (all P > 0.05). In patients with baseline MGE or MQ grade ≤2, both protocols effectively reduced scores to below 1.5. In patients with MGE grade 3, the SET group demonstrated greater improvement (P < 0.01), and episodic exacerbations were observed in the PRN group. The mean number of IPL sessions over 24 months was 14.8 ± 4.2 (median 13.0) in the SET group and 10.0 ± 6.4 (median 8.0) in the PRN group (P < 0.01).
Conclusions:
Both SET and PRN regimens led to symptomatic and functional improvement in MGD. Patients with mild-to-moderate MGD responded well to either regimen. In severe MGD, the SET protocol may provide more stable long-term control, suggesting the importance of individualized treatment approaches.
Financial Disclosure(S):
The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.
More Related Videos
06:06Adjunctive Diode Laser Therapy and Probiotic Lactobacillus Therapy in the Treatment of Periodontitis and Peri-Implant Disease
Published on: May 9, 2022
07:36Clinical Application of Intense Pulsed Light Therapy and Radio Frequency for Treatment of Ocular Surface Diseases
Published on: July 3, 2025
Related Concept Videos
01:27Open Angle Glaucoma: Treatment
Drugs such as carbonic anhydrase inhibitors, α2- and...
01:28Angle Closure Glaucoma: Treatment
01:22Alzheimer's Disease: Treatment
01:23Treatment for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Prostacyclin Receptor Agonists
These agonists bind to the IPR receptor situated on the plasma membrane of the pulmonary artery smooth muscle cells. This binding triggers a cascade of reactions known as the GS-AC-cAMP-PKA pathway. This pathway results in the relaxation of smooth muscle...
01:27Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care