Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 15, 2026

Flexible Colonoscopy in Mice to Evaluate the Severity of Colitis and Colorectal Tumors Using a Validated Endoscopic Scoring System
Published on: October 16, 2013
AI-Assisted Capsule Endoscopy for Detection of Ulcers and Erosions in Crohn's Disease: A Multicenter Validation Study
Patrícia Andrade1, Miguel Mascarenhas1, Francisco Mendes1
1Department of Gastroenterology, São João University Hospital, Porto, Portugal.
Background & Aims:
Small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE) is limited by lengthy, variable interpretation. Artificial intelligence (AI) offers a transformative approach, enabling faster and more accurate lesion detection. This multicenter study aimed to validate an AI model for ulcers and erosions across different SBCE devices.
Methods:
A multicenter, cross-sectional cohort study was conducted from 2021 to 2024, involving centers in Europe and the United States. Two SBCE devices (PillCamSB3 and Olympus EC-10) were used. The performance of AI-assisted reading, generated by a deep learning model, was compared with standard-of-care (SoC) reading using a reference standard defined by an independent review board. The study utilized 2 SBCE devices (PillCamSB3, Olympus EC-10) and analyzed 259 SBCE exams. The performance of AI-assisted reading generated by the deep learning model was compared with SoC reading against a reference standard defined by an independent review board.
Results:
Ulcers and erosions were detected in 93 (35.9%) patients. SoC had 69.6% sensitivity, 99.4% specificity, 98.5% positive predictive value, 85.6% negative predictive value, and 88.8% accuracy. AI-assisted reading detected ulcers and erosions with 90.2% sensitivity, 84.4% specificity, 76.1% positive predictive value, 94.0% negative predictive value, and 86.5% accuracy. The detection yield of AI-assisted reading was superior (P < .001) to conventional SoC reading. The AI-assisted physician SBCE reading identified 568 lesions (94.7%) out of 600 identified by expert board review. The median AI-assisted CE reporting time was 172 seconds per exam.
Conclusions:
The AI-assisted SBCE reading achieved superior diagnostic performance compared with SoC, with a substantial decrease in reading time.
More Related Videos
09:42Murine Endoscopy for In Vivo Multimodal Imaging of Carcinogenesis and Assessment of Intestinal Wound Healing and Inflammation
Published on: August 26, 2014
09:01Non-invasive Assessment of the Efficacy of New Therapeutics for Intestinal Pathologies Using Serial Endoscopic Imaging of Live Mice
Published on: March 10, 2015
Related Concept Videos
Endoscopic Procedures III: Video Capsule Endoscopy
Peptic Ulcer Disease III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Few clinical manifestations differentiate gastric ulcers from duodenal ulcers. Distinctions in the location, timing, and pain relief are crucial for healthcare providers in differentiating between gastric and duodenal ulcers during clinical assessments.
Drugs for Peptic Ulcer Disease: Sucralfate as Mucosal Protective Agents
In this scenario, mucosal protective agents like sucralfate play an essential role. Sucralfate, a complex of sulfated sucrose and aluminum hydroxide, demonstrates its usefulness in acidic conditions,...
Endoscopic Procedures V: ERCP
Patient...
Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...
Endoscopic Procedures II: Colonoscopy