Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 15, 2026

Imaging of the Microstructural Failure Mechanism in the Human Hip
Published on: September 29, 2023
Fracture-dislocation of the proximal humerus: a marker of poor outcome
Jack C Adams1, Steven Rivero1, Nicole Stevens1
1Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Health, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
Background:
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect that associated glenohumeral dislocations have on outcomes following surgical treatment of proximal humerus fractures (PHFs).
Methods:
This institutional review board-approved study reports on 301 patients who underwent operative treatment for PHFs at an academic medical center from January 2006 to January 2023. Fractures were classified according to the Neer system. Patients were separated into 2 cohorts based on whether a glenohumeral dislocation was present at the time of initial injury. Outcomes measured included the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score, shoulder range of motion (forward elevation, external rotation, internal rotation), readmission rates, complications, hardware removal, and need for revision surgery. Independent samples t tests and χ2 analysis were used for continuous and categorical variables, respectively. A binary logistic regression was performed to analyze the influence of these factors on complication rate.
Results:
230 patients sustained an isolated fracture (PHF) and 71 sustained a fracture-dislocation (FD). Significant differences were observed between the FD and PHF groups in all measured outcomes. The FD group had a poorer DASH score (24.38 ± 19.09 vs. 10.54 ± 13.67; P < .001) and reduced range of shoulder motion in forward elevation (114° ± 40° vs. 162° ± 19°; P < .001), external rotation (40° ± 19° vs. 66° ± 19°; P < .001), and internal rotation (57° ± 26° vs. 82° ± 21°; P < .001). Readmission rates were higher in the FD group (0.28 ± 0.85 vs. 0.05 ± 0.28; P < .001). The FD cohort also had a higher rate of complications (25.35% vs. 6.52%; P < .001), need for removal of hardware (14.08% vs. 3.04%; P = .002), and overall revision surgery (11.27% vs. 1.30%; P < .001). The FD cohort demonstrated a greater incidence of avascular necrosis (12.68% vs. 4.35%; P = .012). No significant difference was observed regarding rates of fracture healing and recurrent dislocation. Multivariate analysis in the form of binary logistic regression indicated that FD significantly increased the complication risk (odds ratio 3.310, 95% confidence interval 1.42-7.70; P = .005).
Conclusion:
Proximal humerus FDs are associated with worse functional outcomes and higher complication rates compared with those without dislocations. These findings highlight the potential need for specialized treatment strategies to mitigate the impact of dislocation on recovery.
Related Concept Videos
Bones of the Upper Limb: Humerus
Fractures: Bone Repair
Minor fractures with no bone displacement are treated by immobilizing the fractured bone using a cast or splint. However, in the case of fractures with displaced bones, the broken bones are repositioned before immobilization to ensure successful healing without deformation and loss of function. The realignment of fractured bone ends is performed through a process called reduction. If the...
Bones of the Upper Limb: Ulna
Bones of the Upper Limb: Radius
The radius has a nail-shaped head, and a...

