Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 15, 2026

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
Published on: October 23, 2020
Rural-urban disparities in cardiovascular and other competing risk of death among cancer patients
Tianwang Guan1, Jiaqi He2, Liangjia Zeng3
1Guangdong Engineering Research Center of Boron Neutron Therapy and Application in Malignant Tumors, Dongguan Key Laboratory of Precision Diagnosis and Treatment for Tumors, Dongguan Engineering Research Center for Innovative Boron Drugs and Novel Radioimmune Drugs, Cancer Center, The 10th Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University (Dongguan People's Hospital), Southern Medical University, Guangdong 523059, China; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Cardiac Function and Microcirculation, Guangzhou 510280, China; Cardio-Oncology Group, Medical Exploration and Translation Team, Guangzhou 510000, China.
Introduction:
Rural-urban disparity of cancer is a major public health problem, with an unclear gap in noncancer death. It is important to evaluate rural-urban disparities in cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) and other competing death among cancer patients.
Objectives:
Observing urban-rural disparities and trends in noncancer deaths in the U.S. cancer population.
Methods:
To address rural-urban disparities, we used proportions of deaths, age-adjusted mortality rates (AAMR), cumulative mortality rates, subdistribution hazard ratio (sHR), standardized mortality ratios (SMRs), absolute excess risks (AERs) and mediation analysis.
Results:
Between 1990 and 2017, there were 2,022,482 patients of 24 cancer sites, with a median follow-up of 11·8 years. Rural proportions of noncancer and CVD deaths in cancer patients were higher than urban ones. Rural AAMR of noncancer and CVD deaths surpassed urban one in cancer patients, who had higher cumulative mortality rates than urban counterparts in noncancer (sHR:1·21, 95 % confidence interval [CI]:1·19-1·22), CVDs (sHR:1·25, 95 % CI: 1·23-1·28), diabetes mellitus (sHR:1·24, 95 % CI:1·15-1·34), Alzheimer's disease (sHR:1·30, 95 % CI:1·21-1·39), pneumonia and influenza (sHR:1·30, 95 % CI:1·21-1·39) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and allied cond (sHR:1·32, 95 % CI:1·26-1·39). Compared with the general population, both rural (SMR:4·58, AER:218·03) and urban (SMR: 3·74, AER: 166·61) cancer patients had higher risks of noncancer death. Mediation analyses identified median household income and SEER stages as the mediators.
Conclusion:
Rural cancer patients had higher risks of noncancer death than urban counterparts, especially CVD-related deaths. Future targeted policy and public health interventions are needed to diminish the rural-urban gap in such death disparities.
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Survival Analysis
Relative Risk
Rous Sarcoma Virus (RSV) and Cancer
RSV is a retrovirus that contains two copies of a plus-strand RNA genome. Its genome consists of four main open...
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Cancer Prevention
Some...

