Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 15, 2026

Introducing an Angle Adjustable Cutting Box for Analyzing Slice Shear Force in Meat
Published on: April 26, 2013
Alberta beef industry stakeholders' perspectives towards adoption of preconditioning practices: A thematic analysis
Sanjaya Mijar1, Jennifer Pearson1, Nathanael Lutevele1
1Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta T2N 4Z6, Canada.
Abstract:
Preconditioning offers significant benefits for calf health, performance, and a smoother transition to the feedlot environment, while also helping to reduce antimicrobial use in feedlots. Despite these benefits, the adoption of preconditioning by cow-calf producers, as well as the buying and selling of preconditioned calves by feedlot operators and auctioneers, remains relatively low. However, some producers continue to precondition their calves regardless of lack of industry interest. To increase the implementation of preconditioning and improve calves' welfare within the industry, it is crucial to understand the motivators and barriers influencing its adoption among cow-calf operators, feedlot operators, and auctioneers, as well as the associated market dynamics around preconditioned calves. Therefore, semi-structured interviews were conducted with twelve cow-calf operators, three feedlot operators, and five auctioneers in Alberta, and the data were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis. Motivations and barriers were classified as either generic or specific to participant groups. Five key themes were identified regarding stakeholders' perceptions of preconditioning practices: 1) Ranchers' satisfaction and accountability: the heartbeat of preconditioning, 2) Thriving calves: preconditioning for healthier calves, smooth transition, 3) No gain, no preconditioning: financial incentives drive adoption, 4) The quest for preconditioning proof: buyers struggle without verification, and 5) Supply shortfall: shortage of preconditioned calves during periods of high market demands. Producers who preconditioned their calves were primarily motivated by a sense of personal satisfaction, driven by improved welfare of their calves. In contrast, those who did not practice preconditioning emphasized the lack of a price premium as a significant barrier. While all stakeholders recognized the health benefits and quicker acclimatization of preconditioned calves to the feedlot, auctioneers and feedlot operators reported a lack of reliable verification and the low supply of preconditioned calves as major challenges. We concluded that by implementing third-party verification of preconditioning practices, expanding online auctions tailored to preconditioned calves, and establishing trust and financial incentives can encourage greater adoption of preconditioning practices within the beef industry, ultimately leading to improved animal health, productivity, and welfare.
More Related Videos
09:04Transcriptome Profiling of In-Vivo Produced Bovine Pre-implantation Embryos Using Two-color Microarray Platform
Published on: January 30, 2017
07:46Author Spotlight: Improving Beef Cattle Nutrition and Production with a Focus on Feed Efficiency and Meat Quality Traits Through Advanced Biochemical and Molecular Assays
Published on: July 12, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Confirmation Biases
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Decision Making: P-value Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...