Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 15, 2026

Integration of Bioinformatics Approaches and Experimental Validations to Understand the Role of Notch Signaling in Ovarian Cancer
Published on: January 12, 2020
Assessing the Status of Cyclin E1 (CCNE1) From Gene to Protein Level in Ovarian and Endometrial Carcinomas: A
Alexis Trecourt1, Catherine Genestie2, Alexander Valent3
1Hospices Civils de Lyon, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Service de Pathologie Multi-Site, Pierre-Bénite, France; Faculté de Médecine Lyon Sud, Centre pour l'innovation en cancérologie de Lyon (CICLY), Université Claude Bernard Lyon-1, UR 3738, Lyon, France; Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) U981, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.
Abstract:
Twenty percent and 45.4% of high-grade ovarian carcinomas (OC) and endometrial carcinomas (EC) exhibit CCNE1 amplification (CCNE1-amp), respectively, which is related to poor prognosis, but could serve as predictive biomarker for response to innovative targeted therapies. However, there is no consensus regarding how to evaluate the CCNE1 status (at the DNA, RNA, and/or protein level). Therefore, we conducted a systematic review of CCNE1 status testing in tubo-ovarian neoplasms and EC, comparing their performance for clinical purposes and highlighting the test's interpretation criteria (CRD420250651291). Among the 734 records initially found on PubMed and Google Scholar, 48 reports were finally included. Molecular analyses and immunohistochemistry (IHC) were reported on 9774 tubo-ovarian neoplasms and 750 EC, and 6966 tubo-ovarian neoplasms and 856 EC, respectively. The most frequently morphological used method to detect CCNE1-amp was fluorescent in situ hybridization (13/16 studies, 81.3%), with quite consensual criteria to defined amplification (ie, CCNE1/chromosome 19 ratio ≥2, and/or >8/≥8 copies of CCNE1 per nucleus, and/or ≥4 CCNE1 copies in ≥40% of cells). The proportion of tubo-ovarian neoplasms with CCNE1 immunohistochemical overexpression varied from 13.5% to 96%, and 14.6% to 86.1% in EC. The sensitivity and specificity of CCNE1 IHC to detect/exclude CCNE1-amp varied from 54.5% to 100% and 59.3% to 90.1%, respectively. Given the reported data, CCNE1 overexpression should be considered either when an H-score is ≥100 or when the staining is >60% with >5% of cells strongly stained. Both CCNE1-amp and CCNE1 overexpressions were associated with poor prognosis and with response to Wee1 and CDK2 inhibitors in high-grade serous OC (overall response rate up to 53%, objective response rate of 32%-40%). In contrast, CCNE1 messenger RNA overexpression had no prognostic value. Thus, both CCNE1-amp detection by fluorescent in situ hybridization and CCNE1 protein levels quantification using IHC represent today the most validated tools to determine the CCNE1 status in OC/EC.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Positive Regulator Molecules
Inhibition of Cdk Activity
The Cell Cycle Control System
M-Cdk Drives Transition Into Mitosis
Cyclin-dependent kinases, or Cdks, work in concert with cyclins to control cell cycle transitions. M-Cdk, a complex of Cdk1 bound to M cyclin, is a well-known example of this coordinated control that drives the transition from the G2 to the M phase.
M cyclin...

