Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 15, 2026

A Concoction Pipeline for Generating Molecular Operational Taxonomic Units (MOTUs) Among Riparian and Aquatic Beetles
Published on: July 11, 2025
Exploring hidden parasite diversity during a ParasiteBlitz across a coastal habitat gradient using environmental DNA
K M Hill-Spanik1, D M Díaz-Morales2,3,4,5, S D Atkinson6
1Department of Biology, https://ror.org/00390t168College of Charleston, Charleston, SC, USA.
Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding effectively assessed parasite diversity in aquatic habitats. Different sampling methods captured varying parasite groups, highlighting the need for improved databases and primers.
Area of Science:
- Parasitology
- Environmental DNA (eDNA) Metabarcoding
- Aquatic Ecology
Background:
- Parasite biodiversity assessments have historically lagged behind other biodiversity assessments.
- Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding offers a promising approach for detecting parasites in various environmental matrices.
- Limited studies have comprehensively evaluated eDNA metabarcoding for parasite detection across different aquatic habitats and sampling methods.
Purpose of the Study:
- To implement and evaluate eDNA metabarcoding for assessing parasite diversity in four connected aquatic habitats.
- To compare the effectiveness of different sampling methods (sediment, active water filtration, passive water collection) for parasite detection.
- To identify parasite operational taxonomic units (OTUs) and assess the diversity and community structure across habitats.
Main Methods:
- Collected sediment and water samples from four aquatic habitats in coastal South Carolina.
- Utilized five amplicon libraries targeting mitochondrial COI and 18S ribosomal RNA genes for various parasite groups.
- Processed over 5.8 million sequences to identify parasite amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) and operational taxonomic units (OTUs).
Main Results:
- Identified over 1,000 parasite ASVs, corresponding to approximately 600 parasite OTUs across six parasite groups.
- Microsporidians exhibited the highest diversity, and their assay demonstrated the greatest fidelity.
- Actively-filtered water samples captured all six parasite groups, while sediment captured four groups with higher ASV counts.
Conclusions:
- eDNA metabarcoding is effective and efficient for assessing parasite diversity during intensive surveys.
- The optimal sampling method varied by parasite group and habitat, indicating a need for tailored approaches.
- Enhanced parasite sequence databases and primer development are crucial for improving eDNA-based parasite detection.
More Related Videos
06:22The Floating Lab: Standard Operational Procedure for Collecting and Filtering Seawater Samples from Operating Ferries for Environmental DNA Analysis
Published on: August 1, 2025
08:04Use of a Filter Cartridge for Filtration of Water Samples and Extraction of Environmental DNA
Published on: November 25, 2016
Related Concept Videos
Diversity of Protists I
Applications of Molecular Taxonomy
Diversity of Protists III