Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 15, 2026

Spatial Multiobjective Optimization of Agricultural Conservation Practices using a SWAT Model and an Evolutionary Algorithm
Published on: December 9, 2012
Deep multi-objective reinforcement learning for utility-based infrastructural maintenance optimization
Jesse van Remmerden1, Maurice Kenter2, Diederik M Roijers2,3
1Information Systems IE&IS, Eindhoven University of Technology, De Zaale, 5600 MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Abstract:
In this paper, we introduce multi-objective deep centralized multi-agent actor-critic (MO-DCMAC), a multi-objective reinforcement learning method for infrastructural maintenance optimization, an area traditionally dominated by single-objective reinforcement learning (RL) approaches. Previous single-objective RL methods combine multiple objectives, such as probability of collapse and cost, into a singular reward signal through reward-shaping. In contrast, MO-DCMAC can optimize a policy for multiple objectives directly, even when the utility function is nonlinear. We evaluated MO-DCMAC using two utility functions, which use probability of collapse and cost as input. The first utility function is the threshold utility, in which MO-DCMAC should minimize cost so that the probability of collapse is never above the threshold. The second is based on the failure mode, effects, and criticality analysis methodology used by asset managers to assess maintenance plans. We evaluated MO-DCMAC, with both utility functions, in multiple maintenance environments, including ones based on a case study of the historical quay walls of Amsterdam. The performance of MO-DCMAC was compared against multiple rule-based policies based on heuristics currently used for constructing maintenance plans. Our results demonstrate that MO-DCMAC outperforms traditional rule-based policies across various environments and utility functions.
Related Concept Videos
Reinforcement Schedules
Once a behavior is learned,...
Reinforcement
Positive reinforcement occurs when a behavior is followed by the presentation of a rewarding stimulus, increasing the frequency of that behavior. For example:
Distributed Loads: Problem Solving
Optimization Problems
Rolling Resistance: Problem Solving
Optimal Foraging