Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 15, 2026

Creation of a High-Fidelity, Low-Cost, Intraosseous Line Placement Task Trainer via 3D Printing
Published on: August 17, 2022
Are Artificial Intelligence-generated Patient Leaflets Ready for Clinical Use? A Readability Comparison across Common
Jamila Tukur Jido1, Ahmed Al Wizni2
1Department of Geriatric Medicine, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Professional patient information leaflets are more readable than those generated by AI. Current artificial intelligence (AI) models produce complex health content, highlighting the need for clinician review of AI-generated materials.
Area of Science:
- Medical Informatics
- Health Communication
- Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Background:
- Readable patient information is crucial for informed consent and treatment adherence.
- Large language models (LLMs) show potential for generating health education content.
- Systematic comparisons of AI-generated versus professional patient information leaflets (PILs) are lacking.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the readability of PILs generated by three AI platforms (ChatGPT, Gemini, DeepSeek) with those from the Royal College of Surgeons of England (RCS England).
- To evaluate AI-generated health content for three common orthopedic procedures.
Main Methods:
- Analyzed 12 PILs (4 per procedure) using five readability metrics: Flesch reading ease, Flesch-Kincaid grade level, Gunning Fog Index, SMOG Index, and Coleman-Liau Index.
- Used standardized prompts for AI models and RCS England leaflets as professional benchmarks.
Main Results:
- RCS England leaflets exhibited superior readability (Flesch Reading Ease >70, Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level 5.52-7.15).
- AI-generated leaflets often exceeded recommended complexity (Grade Level >12, Gunning Fog/SMOG indicating post-secondary reading).
- ChatGPT was most complex; Gemini and DeepSeek were intermediate but suboptimal.
Conclusions:
- Current AI-generated PILs do not consistently meet readability standards for patient accessibility.
- Professionally authored materials remain more accessible to the general patient population.
- Clinician oversight and quality assurance are essential for AI-integrated patient education materials.
Related Concept Videos
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure
Patient-centered Care
Methods of Documentation III: PIE
Documentation in Long-Term and Home Healthcare Setting
Long-Term Care Facilities
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
Clinical Trials: Overview

