Craniofacial Surgery in Children With Down Syndrome: A 6-decade Scoping Review

John Warner-Levy1, Henry S Chan1, Loren Wilkins1

  • 1From the Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.

Insights

Children with Down syndrome often need craniofacial interventions, but guidelines are lacking. This study found significant geographic variations in procedures and proposes preliminary guidelines to improve care.

Area of Science:

  • Medical research
  • Pediatric surgery
  • Genetics

Background:

  • Children with Down syndrome (DS) frequently exhibit craniofacial anomalies requiring surgical, dental, or orthodontic interventions.
  • Existing guidance for managing these craniofacial aspects in pediatric DS care is limited.
  • Geographic disparities in the availability and reporting of craniofacial procedures for DS patients are notable.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the landscape of craniofacial procedures performed on children with Down syndrome globally.
  • To identify geographic variations in the availability of these interventions.
  • To assess the current state of guidelines and algorithms for craniofacial care in pediatric DS.

Main Methods:

  • A systematic literature search was conducted across PubMed, Web of Science, and African Journals OnLine from 1960 to 2024.
  • Studies reporting elective craniofacial surgical, dental, or orthodontic interventions in pediatric Down syndrome patients were included.
  • Data on procedure types, patient demographics, and age at intervention were extracted.

Main Results:

  • A total of 92 studies detailed 2815 craniofacial procedures, with the United States, Canada, and Germany reporting the highest numbers.
  • No procedures were recorded in Africa or South Asia.
  • Mean ages at intervention varied significantly by procedure, from palatal plate therapy (2.2 years) to hypoglossal nerve stimulator implantation (14.8 years).
  • No comprehensive craniofacial care guidelines were identified, though four care algorithms were found.

Conclusions:

  • There is a significant gap in established craniofacial care guidelines for children with Down syndrome.
  • The study highlights the need for developing preliminary guidelines, emphasizing early screening and timely reconstructive care.
  • Further research is required to validate and refine proposed guidelines for optimal patient outcomes.
Abstract