Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 15, 2026

Real-Time Proxy-Control of Re-Parameterized Peripheral Signals using a Close-Loop Interface
Published on: May 8, 2021
Weber-Fechner law in temporal difference learning derived from control as inference
Keiichiro Takahashi1, Taisuke Kobayashi2, Tomoya Yamanokuchi1
1Division of Information Science, Nara Institute of Science and Technology, Ikoma, Japan.
None:
This study investigates a novel nonlinear update rule for value and policy functions based on temporal difference (TD) errors in reinforcement learning (RL). The update rule in standard RL states that the TD error is linearly proportional to the degree of updates, treating all rewards equally without any bias. On the other hand, recent biological studies have revealed that there are nonlinearities in the TD error and the degree of updates, biasing policies towards being either optimistic or pessimistic. Such biases in learning due to nonlinearities are expected to be useful and intentionally leftover features in biological learning. Therefore, this research explores a theoretical framework that can leverage the nonlinearity between the degree of the update and TD errors. To this end, we focus on a control as inference framework utilized in the previous work, in which the uncomputable nonlinear term needed to be approximately excluded from the derivation of the standard RL. By analyzing it, the Weber-Fechner law (WFL) is found, in which perception (i.e., the degree of updates) in response to a change in stimulus (i.e., TD error) is attenuated as the stimulus intensity (i.e., the value function) increases. To numerically demonstrate the utilities of WFL on RL, we propose a practical implementation using a reward-punishment framework and modify the definition of optimality. Further analysis of this implementation reveals that two utilities can be expected: i) to accelerate escaping from the situations with small rewards and ii) to pursue the minimum punishment as much as possible. We finally investigate and discuss the expected utilities through simulations and robot experiments. As a result, the proposed RL algorithm with WFL shows the expected utilities that accelerate the reward-maximizing startup and continue to suppress punishments during learning.
Related Concept Videos
Time-Domain Interpretation of PD Control
Consider the example of control of motor torque. Initially, a positive...
Feedback control systems
Linear feedback systems are theoretical models that simplify analysis and design. These systems operate under the principle that their output is directly proportional to their input within certain ranges. For instance, an amplifier in a control system behaves linearly as long as the input signal remains within a specific range. However, most physical systems exhibit inherent nonlinearity...
Frequency-Domain Interpretation of PD Control
The proportional control gain, combined with the...
Time and frequency -Domain Interpretation of Phase-lag Control
Phase-lag controllers do not place a pole at zero, but instead influence the steady-state error by amplifying any...
Cognitive Learning
E. C. Tolman's theory of purposive behavior emphasizes that much behavior is goal-directed. He argued that to understand behavior, we must look at the entire sequence of actions leading to a goal. For instance, high school students study hard, not just due to past reinforcement but also to achieve the goal of getting into a good college.
Tolman introduced the idea that behavior is influenced by...
Transfer Function in Control Systems
To derive the transfer function, consider a general nth-order linear time-invariant...

