Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 15, 2026

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
Published on: February 19, 2021
Documenting adaptations across the Accelerating Colorectal Cancer Screening and follow-up through Implementation
Borsika A Rabin1,2, Erin S Kenzie3,4, Jill M Oliveri5
1Herbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human Longevity Science, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States.
Adaptations are crucial for implementing health programs. This study documented 96 adaptations across eight research programs, revealing varied documentation methods and common pre-implementation changes.
Area of Science:
- Implementation Science
- Public Health Program Adaptation
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Adaptations are essential for the successful implementation of clinical and public health programs.
- Systematic documentation and guidance on program adaptations are lacking.
- Understanding adaptations contextualizes findings and supports future program scale-up.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically document and analyze adaptations made to interventions and implementation strategies within the Accelerating Colorectal Cancer Screening and follow-up through Implementation Science (ACCSIS) Initiative.
- To explore how different research programs within ACCSIS documented and analyzed these adaptations.
- To provide a template for assessing adaptations in large, multi-site research initiatives.
Main Methods:
- Utilized an iterative data gathering approach including surveys, data abstraction, and validation across eight ACCSIS research programs.
- Employed a rapid qualitative analytic approach for reviewing, coding, and summarizing adaptation data.
- An analytic team representing multiple ACCSIS programs conducted the data analysis.
Main Results:
- Significant variation existed in how ACCSIS programs defined and documented adaptations, with common methods including meeting minutes and periodic reflections.
- Nine analytic methods were reported, with rapid qualitative methods, descriptive statistics, and mixed-methods analysis being most frequent.
- A total of 96 adaptations were reported, primarily during the pre-implementation stage (68%) or to program format (71%); 36% were pandemic-related.
Conclusions:
- A systematic, multi-method approach enabled exploration and comparison of adaptation documentation and analysis across ACCSIS programs.
- Findings inform the science of adaptations, highlighting the need for and impact of adaptations on implementation efforts.
- The described methods offer a transferable template for adaptation assessment in other large-scale research initiatives.
More Related Videos
15:49Flexible Colonoscopy in Mice to Evaluate the Severity of Colitis and Colorectal Tumors Using a Validated Endoscopic Scoring System
Published on: October 16, 2013
06:28E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...
Longitudinal Research
Cancer Survival Analysis
Observational Studies
There are three types of observational studies – Prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional.
Prospective Study
Prospective studies, also known as longitudinal or cohort studies, are carried out by collecting future data from groups sharing similar characteristics. One...