Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 10, 2026

Hollow Microneedle-based Sensor for Multiplexed Transdermal Electrochemical Sensing
Published on: June 1, 2012
Nickel Secretion and the Allergenic Potential of Cosmetic Microneedles
Sarah Rigali1, Cindy Zeng1, Andrew Scheman1,2
1Department of Dermatology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
Background:
Microneedling is an increasingly popular cosmetic procedure. However, because needles are made of metal, there is concern among aesthetic physicians and nonphysician providers regarding whether these needles pose a risk to individuals with known metal allergies.
Objective:
To assess nickel release and structural degradation in commonly used microneedling devices.
Materials And Methods:
Five brands of used microneedles were tested for nickel release using the dimethylglyoxime (DMG) spot test. Scanning electron microscopy was used to evaluate structural integrity, focusing on cracks and fissures after use.
Results:
Of the 5 brands tested, 3 released nickel (Device A, Device B, Device E), while 2 did not (Device C, Device D). Needles from all 5 brands demonstrated cracks and fissures after their use. The presence of structural damage to the needles did not correlate with positive DMG testing. Unexpectedly, at least 4 of the companies (Device A, Device B, Device C, Device E) coat their needles with gold.
Conclusion:
Nickel and possibly gold ion release from microneedling could elicit allergic contact dermatitis in sensitized individuals. A prospective study of dermatitis and healing times after microneedling in patients with nickel or gold allergies compared with those without such metal allergies is warranted.
Related Concept Videos
Drug Toxicity: Allergic Reactions
Allergic Reactions: Anaphylaxis

