Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 15, 2026

Utilizing Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock
Published on: June 12, 2021
Prognostic impact of SCAI shock severity classes in AMI-related cardiogenic shock: A sub-study of the ECLS-SHOCK
Janine Pöss1, Jacob Jentzer2, Steffen Desch1
1Heart Center Leipzig, Leipzig University and Leipzig Heart Science, Leipzig, Germany.
Insights
The Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI) classification effectively predicts mortality and safety events in acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock (AMI-CS) patients. Extracorporeal life support (ECLS) efficacy remains consistent across all SCAI stages.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Critical Care Medicine
- Interventional Cardiology
Background:
- Acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (AMI-CS) is a critical condition requiring precise risk stratification.
- The Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI) Classification offers a framework for assessing risk in AMI-CS patients.
- Extracorporeal life support (ECLS) is a vital therapy for severe AMI-CS, but its effectiveness across different risk strata needs evaluation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the prognostic value of SCAI classification stages in patients with AMI-CS.
- To determine if SCAI stages influence the therapeutic effect and safety of ECLS in AMI-CS patients.
- To analyze the association between SCAI stages and outcomes such as mortality, renal replacement therapy, and neurological status.
Main Methods:
- A post-hoc analysis was conducted on patients with AMI-CS enrolled in the multicenter, randomized ECLS-SHOCK trial.
- Patients were categorized into SCAI stages (C, D, E) at the time of admission.
- Outcomes, including 30-day all-cause mortality, renal replacement therapy, and neurological outcomes, were assessed and stratified by SCAI stage.
Main Results:
- SCAI stages C, D, and E were significantly associated with varying risks of 30-day all-cause mortality (32.6%, 67.9%, 64.4%, respectively; P < 0.001).
- Higher SCAI stages correlated with increased rates of 30-day renal replacement therapy (P = 0.03) and poor neurological outcomes (P < 0.001).
- No significant interaction was found between SCAI stage and the treatment effect of ECLS on 30-day all-cause mortality (P = 0.65).
Conclusions:
- SCAI classification at admission is a strong predictor of mortality and safety events in AMI-CS patients within the ECLS-SHOCK trial cohort.
- The prognostic impact of SCAI stages is evident for mortality, renal replacement therapy, and neurological outcomes.
- The efficacy of ECLS treatment in AMI-CS patients is not modified by the patient's SCAI stage at admission.
Aims:
The Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI) Classification provides risk stratification of patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (AMI-CS). This sub-study of the ECLS-SHOCK trial investigates the prognostic impact of SCAI stages in AMI-CS and the influence of SCAI stages on the effect of extracorporeal life support (ECLS) therapy in AMI-CS patients.
Methods:
Patients with AMI-CS enrolled in the multicentre, randomized ECLS-SHOCK trial were included. The outcomes, treatment effect and safety of ECLS were stratified according to SCAI stage at admission using a post-hoc classification.
Results:
From a total of 417 patients enrolled in the ECLS-SHOCK trial between June 2019 and November 2022, 51.6% (n = 215), 13.4% (n = 56) and 35.0% (n = 146) presented in SCAI Stages C, D and E, respectively. SCAI stages were associated with the risk of 30 day all-cause mortality (C vs. D vs. E: 32.6% vs. 67.9% vs. 64.4%, P < 0.001), with rates of renal replacement therapy at 30 days (C vs. D vs. E: 7.0% vs. 19.6% vs. 13.7%, P = 0.03) and with poor neurological outcomes (C vs. D vs. E: 17.2% vs. 44.4% vs. 36.5%, P < 0.001). No interaction was observed between SCAI stage and the treatment effect of ELCS on 30 day all-cause mortality (ELCS vs. control SCAI C: 32.7% vs. 32.4%; SCAI D: 68.4% vs. 66.7%; SCAI E: 59.7% vs. 68.4%, P for interaction = 0.65).
Conclusions:
In AMI-CS patients included in the ECLS-SHOCK trial, SCAI stages at admission were predictive for mortality and for the incidence of safety events. The efficacy of ECLS treatment was not affected by SCAI stage.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation IV: Pharmacological Management
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome II: Pathophysiology and Clinical Manifestations
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care

