Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 15, 2026

Author Spotlight: Rehabilitation of Stroke Patients With a Digital Occupational Training System
Published on: December 29, 2023
Artificial intelligence in occupational therapy documentation: Chatbot vs. Occupational Therapists
1Department of ICT Convergence, The Graduate School, Soonchunhyang University, Asan, Republic of Korea.
Background:
Artificial intelligence (AI)-based language models such as ChatGPT show promise in generating medical documentation. However, their effectiveness in occupational therapy (OT) documentation-particularly in terms of perceived quality and empathy-remains underexplored.
Objective:
This study aimed to compare the quality and empathy of clinical documentation generated by licensed occupational therapists versus ChatGPT-3.5, using standardized OT case scenarios.
Methods:
Fifteen standardized OT cases were used to generate human- and AI-written assessment and plan sections. Five occupational therapists and five patients or caregivers independently evaluated the documentation using 5-point Likert scales across three quality subdomains (completeness, correctness, concordance) and three empathy dimensions (cognitive, affective, behavioral). Inter-rater reliability and correlations between quality and empathy were also analyzed.
Results:
Artificial intelligence-generated documentation received significantly higher ratings across all quality and empathy dimensions than human-generated documentation (all p < 0.001). However, human-generated documentation demonstrated stronger correlations between quality and empathy, and higher inter-rater reliability, indicating greater consistency among evaluators. These findings suggest that while AI can produce responses perceived as more complete and empathetic, its outputs may vary more widely in interpretation.
Conclusion:
Artificial intelligence-based tools may help reduce documentation burdens for therapists by generating high-quality, empathetic notes. However, human-authored documentation remains more consistent across evaluators. These results underscore the potential and limitations of AI in clinical documentation, highlighting the need for further development to enhance contextual sensitivity, communication coherence, and evaluator reliability. Future research should examine AI performance in real-world OT practice settings.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Documentation in Long-Term and Home Healthcare Setting
Long-Term Care Facilities
Interdisciplinary Care: The Health Care Team-II
Physical Therapist
A physical therapist (PT) aims to restore function or prevent additional impairment in a patient following an injury or disease. Massage, heat, cold, water, sonar waves, exercises, and electrical stimulation are some treatments used by PTs to treat...
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...
Modeling in Therapy
Participant Modeling
Participant modeling involves therapists demonstrating calm and effective behaviors in...
Methods of Documentation II: POMR
Methods of Documentation IV: Focus Charting
It typically involves three columns for recording information:

