Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A new strategy for regulating long-term care facilities.

H S Ruchlin

    Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law
    |January 1, 1977
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    An economic overview of prostate carcinoma.

    Cancer·2001
    Same author

    Costeffectiveness of diagnostic tests.

    Lancet (London, England)·2001
    Same author

    The economic impact of a multifactorial intervention to improve postoperative rehabilitation of hip fracture patients.

    Arthritis and rheumatism·2001
    Same author

    An economic overview of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

    PharmacoEconomics·2001
    Same author

    The Collection of Indirect and Nonmedical Direct Costs (COIN) form: a new tool for collecting the invisible costs of androgen independent prostate carcinoma.

    Cancer·2001
    Same author

    Clinical economics of head and neck malignancies.

    Hematology/oncology clinics of North America·1999

    Current long-term care facility regulations are failing due to several factors. This study proposes a new strategy focusing on process improvements and environmental changes to enhance regulatory effectiveness and improve care quality.

    Area of Science:

    • Healthcare Management
    • Public Policy
    • Gerontology

    Background:

    • Current regulatory frameworks for long-term care facilities demonstrate significant performance deficits.
    • Analysis identifies seven key factors contributing to regulatory failure: inadequate financing, knowledge gaps, bureaucratic apathy, legal and political constraints, fragmented agency responsibilities, and bed shortages.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To analyze the shortcomings of existing long-term care (LTC) regulatory efforts.
    • To propose a comprehensive strategy for improving the regulatory process and environment in LTC facilities.

    Main Methods:

    • Critical analysis of current regulatory failures in long-term care.
    • Review and rejection of alternative regulatory models (public utility, market regulation, non-profit control).

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Development of a new strategy focusing on programmatic approaches, integrated processes, consumer involvement, and public transparency.

    • Main Results:

    • Identified seven critical factors hindering regulatory effectiveness in LTC.
    • Proposed improvements include adopting a program-based agency approach, linking inspection and rate-setting, involving consumers, and increasing public scrutiny.
    • Recommended environmental improvements: removing entry barriers, supporting alternatives to institutionalization, federalizing Medicaid, moving beyond the medical model, and shifting focus to outcomes.

    Conclusions:

    • Existing regulatory strategies for long-term care facilities are inadequate.
    • A multi-faceted approach is needed, enhancing both the regulatory process and environment.
    • The proposed strategy offers a framework for improving long-term care quality through systemic regulatory reform.