Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Random Error01:04

Random Error

8.1K
Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...
8.1K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error01:10

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

1.3K
The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...
1.3K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error00:59

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

1.7K
An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...
1.7K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

14.3K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
14.3K
Classification of Signals01:30

Classification of Signals

1.3K
In signal processing, signals are classified based on various characteristics: continuous-time versus discrete-time, periodic versus aperiodic, analog versus digital, and causal versus noncausal. Each category highlights distinct properties crucial for understanding and manipulating signals.
A continuous-time signal holds a value at every instant in time, representing information seamlessly. In contrast, a discrete-time signal holds values only at specific moments, often denoted as x(n), where...
1.3K
Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test01:02

Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test

3.5K
Sometimes, a data set can have a recorded numerical observation that greatly  deviates from the rest of the data. Assuming that the data is normally distributed, a statistical method called the Grubbs test can be used to determine whether the observation is truly an outlier.  To perform a two-tailed Grubbs test, first, calculate the absolute difference between the outlier and the mean. Then, calculate the ratio between this difference and the standard deviation of the sample. This...
3.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Leveraging remote sensing and crowd-sourced biodiversity data for enhanced plant functional trait mapping.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Kernel detrended fluctuation analysis: A nonlinear, multivariate method for detecting long-range persistence.

Chaos (Woodbury, N.Y.)·2026
Same author

Accelerated north-east shift of the global green wave trajectory.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

GeoAI: Beyond mapping earth and cities through explainability, adaptability, and sustainability.

iScience·2026
Same author

FireCastNet: earth-as-a-graph for seasonal fire prediction.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Managing refugee shipwreck casualties in Greece: identification readiness and literature insights.

Forensic science, medicine, and pathology·2025
Same journal

Poly(bromophenol blue)/CoSn(OH)<sub>6</sub> cubic particles modified pencil graphite electrode for electrochemical determination of diphenhydramine.

Scientific reports·2026
Same journal

Dietary Chlorella, Spirulina, and acidifier modulate jejunal cytokine-related gene expression in broiler chickens.

Scientific reports·2026
Same journal

Perceived physical activity barriers in university students: associations with fatigue and eating behaviours.

Scientific reports·2026
Same journal

Refuge limitation structures habitat use in agricultural landscapes: evidence from Sunda pangolins.

Scientific reports·2026
Same journal

Lightweight stateless transaction verification with outsourced witness updates for UTXO blockchains.

Scientific reports·2026
Same journal

Efficacy of historical context and exogenous features on deep learning for cooling load forecasting in chilled water plants.

Scientific reports·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 15, 2026

Combining Eye-tracking Data with an Analysis of Video Content from Free-viewing a Video of a Walk in an Urban Park Environment
08:25

Combining Eye-tracking Data with an Analysis of Video Content from Free-viewing a Video of a Walk in an Urban Park Environment

Published on: May 7, 2019

9.6K

Probabilistic machine learning for noisy labels in Earth observation.

Spyros Kondylatos1,2, Nikolaos Ioannis Bountos3,4, Ioannis Prapas3,5

  • 1Orion Lab, National Observatory of Athens & National Technical University of Athens, 15772, Athens, Greece. skondylatos@noa.gr.

Scientific Reports
|October 14, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Probabilistic machine learning (ML) models effectively address label noise in Earth Observation (EO) by quantifying data uncertainty. These uncertainty-aware models enhance the reliability and interpretability of ML solutions for critical EO applications.

More Related Videos

Flying Insect Detection and Classification with Inexpensive Sensors
05:16

Flying Insect Detection and Classification with Inexpensive Sensors

Published on: October 15, 2014

25.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 15, 2026

Combining Eye-tracking Data with an Analysis of Video Content from Free-viewing a Video of a Walk in an Urban Park Environment
08:25

Combining Eye-tracking Data with an Analysis of Video Content from Free-viewing a Video of a Walk in an Urban Park Environment

Published on: May 7, 2019

9.6K
Flying Insect Detection and Classification with Inexpensive Sensors
05:16

Flying Insect Detection and Classification with Inexpensive Sensors

Published on: October 15, 2014

25.7K

Area of Science:

  • Earth Observation (EO)
  • Machine Learning (ML)
  • Geospatial Data Analysis
  • Data Science

Background:

  • Label noise significantly degrades supervised ML model performance in Earth Observation (EO).
  • Reliable ML solutions are crucial for high-impact EO applications.
  • Existing methods often fail to account for domain-specific noise sources in EO data.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To leverage probabilistic ML for modeling input-dependent label noise in EO.
  • To quantify data uncertainty in EO tasks, addressing unique noise characteristics.
  • To develop and assess uncertainty-aware ML models for improved EO applications.

Main Methods:

  • Training uncertainty-aware probabilistic models across diverse EO applications.
  • Utilizing a dedicated pipeline to evaluate model accuracy and reliability.
  • Assessing performance against standard deterministic ML approaches.

Main Results:

  • Uncertainty-aware models demonstrated superior performance over deterministic models in most EO datasets and metrics.
  • Rigorous evaluation validated the reliability of predicted uncertainty estimates.
  • Enhanced interpretability of model predictions was achieved through uncertainty quantification.

Conclusions:

  • Modeling label noise and incorporating uncertainty quantification are vital for robust EO solutions.
  • Probabilistic ML offers a promising direction for trustworthy AI in Earth Observation.
  • The study paves the way for more reliable and interpretable ML applications in the EO domain.