Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 15, 2026

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
Published on: September 20, 2019
Establishing core outcomes and minimal clinically important differences for childhood steroid sensitive nephrotic
Cal H Robinson1,2,3, Simon Carter4,5, Nowrin Aman6
1Division of Nephrology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada. cal.robinson@sickkids.ca.
Insights
Researchers established consensus on core outcomes for childhood nephrotic syndrome trials. This includes key disease and patient-reported outcomes, improving future research quality and reporting for steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Nephrology
- Clinical Trial Methodology
- Patient-Reported Outcomes
Background:
- Limited randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in childhood nephrotic syndrome contribute to global practice variation.
- Inconsistent outcome reporting and lack of justified minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) hinder research progress.
- Need for consensus on core outcomes, assessment timepoints, MCIDs, and desirability of outcome ranking (DOOR) endpoints for childhood steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome (SSNS).
Purpose of the Study:
- Establish consensus on core outcomes for childhood SSNS research.
- Define assessment timepoints and MCIDs for key endpoints.
- Identify DOOR endpoints to enhance clinical trial design and interpretation.
Main Methods:
- Two-stage Delphi consensus survey involving international healthcare providers and Canadian patients/caregivers.
- Likert scale ratings for potential outcomes and MCID value assignments for relapse and remission.
- Facilitated workshops and thematic analysis of qualitative data to explore perspectives on trial outcomes and MCIDs.
Main Results:
- Eighty-one participants (45 providers, 36 patients/caregivers) reached consensus.
- Three core disease outcomes: relapse rate, relapse-free survival, and relapse occurrence.
- Median MCIDs: 25% absolute difference in relapse risk (1-year) and 10% absolute difference in remission (2 weeks).
- Five core patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and DOOR endpoints for relapse and remission achieved consensus.
Conclusions:
- Consensus achieved on core disease and patient-reported outcomes for childhood nephrotic syndrome research.
- Findings provide a foundation for improving the quality and consistency of future SSNS trials.
- Standardized outcomes and MCIDs will enhance interpretability and comparability of research findings.
Background:
Few randomized controlled trials are conducted in childhood nephrotic syndrome, and substantial global practice variation exists. Trials have not reported consistent outcomes, patient-reported outcomes, or justified minimal clinically important differences (MCID). Our aim was to establish consensus on core outcomes, assessment timepoints, MCIDs, and desirability of outcome ranking (DOOR) endpoints for future childhood steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome research.
Methods:
We conducted a two-stage Delphi consensus survey of international healthcare providers and Canadian patients and caregivers with experience in childhood nephrotic syndrome. Respondents rated potential outcomes using Likert scales and assigned MCID values for relapse and remission endpoints. Following the surveys, we held workshops for healthcare providers and patients/caregivers in Toronto, Canada, with facilitated discussions. Qualitative data was analyzed thematically to explore perspectives on childhood nephrotic syndrome clinical trial outcomes and MCIDs.
Results:
Eighty-one participants (45 providers, 36 patients/caregivers, 63% Canadian) responded to the surveys. Three disease outcomes (relapse rate, relapse-free survival, and relapse occurrence) met consensus criteria as core outcomes. Median MCID values were a 25% absolute difference between two treatments in relapse risk by 1-year (for relapse prevention) choices and 10% absolute difference in remission by 2 weeks (for relapse treatment). Consensus was achieved for five core patient-reported outcomes (pain, physical symptoms, physical function and mobility, life participation, and social function) and DOOR endpoints for nephrotic syndrome relapse and remission.
Conclusions:
Consensus exists among surveyed participants on core disease and patient-reported outcomes for childhood nephrotic syndrome research. Findings can improve the quality and reporting of future trials in this population.
More Related Videos
06:31Precision Implementation of Minimal Erythema Dose MED Testing to Assess Individual Variation in Human Inflammatory Response
Published on: October 3, 2019
06:16Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
Published on: June 6, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Nephrotic Syndrome II : Assessment and Medical Management
Clinically Relevant Drug Product Specifications: Methods of Establishment
Nephrotic Syndrome I : Introduction
Nephrotic Syndrome III : Nursing Management
Clinical Trials: Overview
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...