Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 15, 2026

Exploring Caspase Mutations and Post-Translational Modification by Molecular Modeling Approaches
Published on: October 13, 2022
Practical Outcomes From CASP16 for Users in Need of Biomolecular Structure Prediction
Luciano A Abriata1, Matteo Dal Peraro1
1Laboratory for Biomolecular Modeling and Protein Structure Core Facility, School of Life Sciences, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL) and Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Lausanne, Switzerland.
The 16th Critical Assessment of Structure Prediction shows AlphaFold 3 (AF3) nearing state-of-the-art in biomolecular modeling, excelling in protein monomer and ligand binding but struggling with nucleic acids and antibody interactions.
Area of Science:
- Computational biology and structural bioinformatics.
- Artificial intelligence in molecular modeling.
Background:
- The Critical Assessment of Structure Prediction (CASP) benchmarks progress in computational protein structure prediction.
- Advancements in deep learning, exemplified by AlphaFold 2 (AF2) and AlphaFold 3 (AF3), have revolutionized biomolecular modeling.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the performance of state-of-the-art biomolecular modeling tools, including AlphaFold 3, in the 16th CASP.
- To assess the capabilities and limitations of AI-driven structure prediction for proteins, protein complexes, and nucleic acids.
- To provide guidance on tool selection and interpretation of AI-generated structural models.
Main Methods:
- Benchmarking of various computational methods against experimentally determined structures in the CASP16 dataset.
- Focus on AlphaFold 2 and AlphaFold 3 performance across different prediction tasks: protein monomers, assemblies, and protein-ligand complexes.
- Analysis of prediction accuracy, confidence metrics, and limitations for various biomolecular systems.
Main Results:
- Protein monomer and domain prediction accuracy is near-maximal, with remaining challenges in specific secondary structures and mutational effects.
- AlphaFold-based methods show progress in protein assembly prediction, though complex topologies and antibody-antigen interactions remain difficult.
- AlphaFold 3 demonstrates strong potential in protein-ligand co-folding pose prediction but shows unreliable ligand affinity prediction; nucleic acid prediction capabilities are limited.
Conclusions:
- AlphaFold 3 represents the state of the art in biomolecular modeling, offering improvements over AlphaFold 2 and enhanced confidence metrics.
- Significant challenges persist in predicting complex protein assemblies, antibody-antigen interactions, and nucleic acid structures.
- Accurate interpretation of AI-generated models necessitates understanding their limitations and leveraging confidence metrics for reliable structural insights.
Related Concept Videos
Conserved Binding Sites
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally...
Protein Organization
The primary structure of a protein is its amino acid sequence....
Predicting Molecular Geometry
Caspases
Protein and Protein Structure
A protein's shape is critical to its function. For example, an enzyme...
Protein and Protein Structures

