Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 15, 2026

Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques
Published on: December 9, 2022
Identifying Strengths and Weaknesses in Health Literacy among Medical Students: A Systematic Review
Alvin Baralin1, Emna Boulares1, Sabrina Chen Yin Tan1
1Global Health and Development Department, College of Medicine, Hanyang University, Seoul City, Republic of Korea.
Background:
Limited health literacy is a global public health concern linked with increased healthcare expenses and poor health outcomes. Health literacy (HL) is crucial for medical students as patients and future medical practitioners. This systematic review aims to provide a global understanding of the state of HL among medical students, identify strengths and weaknesses across HL domains, and determine different variables associated with HL.
Methods:
A systematic literature search was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) with the registration number CRD42024608968. The CINAHL, PubMed, Scopus, Medline, and Web of Science were searched for cross-sectional studies that reported the HL of medical students from 2013 to February 2025. The AXIS tool was used to assess the quality of the included studies. The results are presented using narrative analysis.
Results:
Thirteen studies met the inclusion criteria. These studies collectively included 3,647 medical students, approximately 44% female and 29% male. Different HL assessment tools were used, resulting in variations in the findings. Medical students demonstrated proficiency in locating and comprehending health information but faced challenges in managing their own health, feeling understood and supported by healthcare providers, and appraising health information. Symptoms of depression, social support, and the amount of time spent using the internet were associated with HL. All studies included revealed a very low risk of bias.
Conclusion:
The health literacy of medical students ranged from moderate to high. The strengths identified both in the general context and in the digital context were finding and understanding health information. However, areas needing improvement were identified in its practical application, particularly in self-management and critical appraisal of health information. These findings indicate the potential benefit of incorporating targeted health literacy training into medical education to enhance critical thinking, practical application, and communication skills in support of patient-centered care.
More Related Videos
06:28E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
07:32Use of Galvanic Skin Responses, Salivary Biomarkers, and Self-reports to Assess Undergraduate Student Performance During a Laboratory Exam Activity
Published on: February 10, 2016
Related Concept Videos
Health Literacy
Barriers to Effective Communication II
Cultural barriers:
Differences in values, beliefs, religion, knowledge, and tradition can significantly impact communication. Awareness of nonverbal cues is critical, especially when conversing with a patient from a different culture. What appears appropriate in one culture may be inappropriate in another.
Semantic barriers:
As a result of their tendency to use...
Assessment of the Cardiovascular System I: Subjective Data
Initial Enquiry
Ask the patient about their primary concern and thoroughly explore all reported symptoms.
Medical History
Investigate past illnesses affecting the cardiovascular system, such as angina, anemia, rheumatic fever, congenital heart disease, stroke, thrombophlebitis, dysrhythmias, varicosities
Inquire about symptoms...
Methods of Documentation III: PIE
Purpose of Health Records I
Here's a breakdown of how health records serve these purposes:
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients