Benchmarking Precompensated Current-Modulated Diode-Laser-Based Differential Absorption Lidar for CO₂ Gas...

We present a tunable diode-laser absorption spectroscopy (TDLAS) system operating at 1.5711 µm for CO₂ gas concentration measurements. The system can operate in either a traditional direct-mode (dTDLAS) sawtooth wavelength scan or a recently demonstrated wavelength-toggled single laser differential-absorption lidar (WTSL-DIAL) mode using precompensated current pulses. The use of such precompensated pulses offsets the slow thermal constants of the diode laser, leading to fast toggling between ON and OFF-resonance wavelengths. A short measurement time is indeed pivotal for atmospheric sensing, where ambient factors, such as turbulence or mechanical vibrations, would otherwise deteriorate sensitivity, precision and accuracy. Having a system able to operate in both modes allows us to benchmark the novel experimental procedure against the well-established dTDLAS method. The theory behind the new WTSL-DIAL method is also expanded to include the periodicity of the current modulation, fundamental for the calculation of the OFF-resonance wavelength. A two-detector scheme is chosen to suppress the influence of laser intensity fluctuations in time (1/f noise), and its performance is eventually benchmarked against a one-detector approach. The main difference between dTDLAS and WTSL-DIAL, in terms of signal processing, lies in the fact that while the former requires time-consuming data processing, which limits the maximum update rate of the instrument, the latter allows for computationally simpler and faster concentration readings. To compare other performance metrics, the update rate was kept at 2 kHz for both methods. To analyze the dTDLAS data, a four-parameter Lorentzian fit was performed, where the fitting function comprised the six main neighboring absorption lines centered around 1.5711 µm. Similarly, the spectral overlap between the same lines was considered when analyzing the WTSL-DIAL data in real time. Our investigation shows that, for the studied time intervals, the WTSL-DIAL approach is 3.65 ± 0.04 times more precise; however, the dTDLAS-derived CO₂ concentration measurements are less subject to systematic errors, in particular pressure-induced ones. The experimental results are accompanied by a thorough explanation and discussion of the models used, as well as their advantages and limitations.