Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 15, 2026

Author Spotlight: Enhancement of Salient Object Detection for Smart Grid Applications
Published on: December 15, 2023
Sensor Input Type and Location Influence Outdoor Running Terrain Classification via Deep Learning Approaches
Gabrielle Thibault1, Philippe C Dixon1, David J Pearsall1
1Department of Kinesiology and Physical Education, McGill University, Montreal, QC H2W 1S4, Canada.
Researchers found that using acceleration signals from foot-mounted inertial measurement unit (IMU) sensors, combined with gait cycle analysis, accurately classifies running surfaces like grass and asphalt.
Area of Science:
- Biomechanics and Human Movement Analysis
- Machine Learning in Sports Science
- Wearable Sensor Technology
Background:
- Optimizing running performance and preventing injuries requires understanding how different running surfaces affect biomechanics.
- Deep learning models, specifically convolutional neural networks (CNNs), show promise for classifying activities using body-worn sensors.
- No prior research has optimized signal type, sensor location, and model architecture for classifying running surfaces.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify the optimal combination of signal type, sensor location, and CNN architecture for accurately classifying grass and asphalt running surfaces.
- To evaluate the impact of preprocessing steps and data splitting protocols on classification accuracy.
Main Methods:
- Collected full-body inertial measurement unit (IMU) data from 40 runners on grass and asphalt surfaces.
- Tested various signal types (acceleration, angular velocity), sensor configurations (full body, lower body, pelvis, feet), and CNN architectures.
- Assessed the influence of preprocessing (gait cycle separation, amplitude normalization) and data splitting methods (leave-n-subject-out, subject-dependent).
Main Results:
- Acceleration signals outperformed angular velocity, improving classification by 3.8%.
- The foot sensor configuration achieved the highest accuracy (95.5%) relative to the number of sensors used.
- Separating data into gait cycles and avoiding amplitude normalization significantly boosted accuracy by approximately 28%.
Conclusions:
- Key parameters for developing effective machine learning classifiers for human activity recognition have been identified.
- A running surface classification tool can offer valuable feedback to athletes and coaches for training personalization and injury prevention.
- This technology has the potential to enhance running performance by providing quantitative insights into technique and effort across different terrains.
Related Concept Videos
Methods of Obtaining Topography
Force Classification
Contact and non-contact forces are two of the most widely used categories of forces. As the name suggests, contact forces require physical contact between two objects to act upon each other. Examples of contact forces include frictional,...
Types of Global Positioning System Surveys
Design Example: Identifying the Locations of Monuments in the Field Using Global Positioning System Device
Application of Linearization and Approximation

