Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 15, 2026

09:17
Surrogate Model Development for Digital Experiments in Welding
Published on: March 28, 2025
1.8K
Leveraging Machine Learning for Porosity Prediction in AM Using FDM for Pretrained Models and Process Development.
Khadija Ouajjani1, James E Steck2, Gerardo Olivares1
1National Institute for Aviation Research, Wichita, KS 67260, USA.
Materials (Basel, Switzerland)
|October 16, 2025
Summary
Machine learning predicts 3D printing defects by analyzing CT scans. This approach optimizes Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) parameters, reducing trial-and-error and improving quality control for additive manufacturing.
Area of Science:
- Materials Science
- Computer Science
- Mechanical Engineering
Background:
- Additive manufacturing processes like Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) have numerous parameters, leading to inconsistent quality and requiring extensive trial-and-error for optimization.
- Machine learning (ML) offers a data-driven approach to predict and optimize these complex, non-linear relationships.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop an ML-powered pipeline for predicting porosity defects in FDM-printed parts.
- To assess the impact of geometrical scaling on defect prediction accuracy.
- To quantify process variability for enhanced quality control.
Main Methods:
- 3D printing of specimens at two geometrical scales, followed by CT-scanning to generate image datasets.
- Training an ML image classifier to identify defective vs. exploitable prints.
- Developing preprocessing scripts to extract porosity features.
- Training a multi-layer perceptron (MLP) model on extracted features.
- Implementing a grouped k-fold cross-validation protocol for robust model evaluation.
Main Results:
- The image classifier achieved over 97% accuracy in distinguishing defective from exploitable images.
- MLP model accuracy increased from 54.4% (small scale) to 77.6% (large scale) with larger datasets.
- Repeatability studies quantified intrinsic process variability, with an average porosity standard deviation of 0.47%.
Conclusions:
- An ML pipeline can effectively predict porosity defects in FDM parts, reducing the need for manual optimization.
- Geometrical scaling significantly impacts defect formation and the accuracy of ML-based prediction models.
- The developed methodology provides a framework for robust quality control in additive manufacturing.
Related Concept Videos
Porosity in Cement Paste
429
The porosity of concrete is a measure of the void spaces within its structure. These spaces impact its strength and durability significantly. When water and cement interact, a chemical reaction called hydration creates a semi-solid paste. This paste includes combined water, making up approximately 23% of the cement's dry mass, and gel water, which fills minuscule voids known as gel pores, accounting for about 28% of the cement gel volume.
The balance of water to cement in the mix is...
The balance of water to cement in the mix is...
429
Porosity and Absorption of Aggregate
735
Aggregates contain pores of varying sizes; while some are completely enclosed within the particles, others open onto the surface, allowing water to penetrate. The porosity of aggregates is a major factor contributing to the overall porosity of concrete, given that aggregates constitute about three-quarters of concrete's volume.
When all pores in an aggregate are filled with water, the aggregate is considered saturated and surface-dry. If left in dry air, water will evaporate until the...
When all pores in an aggregate are filled with water, the aggregate is considered saturated and surface-dry. If left in dry air, water will evaporate until the...
735

