Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 15, 2026

Cell-based Assay Protocol for the Prognostic Prediction of Idiopathic Scoliosis Using Cellular Dielectric Spectroscopy
Published on: October 16, 2013
Predictive Modeling of Central Precocious Puberty Using IGF-1 and IGFBP-3 Standard Deviation Scores
Rihwa Choi1,2, Gayoung Chun3, Sung-Eun Cho4
1Laboratory Medicine Center, Division of Laboratory Medicine, GC Labs, Yongin-si 16924, Republic of Korea.
None:
Background/Objectives: Central precocious puberty (CPP) is diagnosed via gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) stimulation testing, which can be burdensome in pediatric settings. This study evaluated the utility of baseline hormonal markers-particularly insulin-like growth fac-tor 1 (IGF-1) and IGF-binding protein 3 (IGFBP-3)-as auxiliary tools for CPP diagnosis in Korean children. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent GnRH stimulation testing. Baseline LH, FSH, IGF-1, and IGFBP-3 levels were assessed, along with standard deviation scores (SDS) calculated using two different reference intervals. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to improve diagnostic accuracy. Performance was evaluated using area under the curve (AUC) values from receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses, stratified by sex. Results: Among 2464 Korean children (2025 girls and 439 boys), CPP diagnosis rates were 54.2% in girls and 65.6% in boys. Among baseline markers, FSH showed the highest AUCs using raw values with sex-specific cutoffs (AUC = 0.767 in girls and 0.895 in boys). Although IGF-1 SDS and IGFBP-3 SDS showed AUCs < 0.7 when used alone, predictive models incorporating these SDS values yielded higher performance (AUC = 0.800 in girls and 0.920 in boys. Conclusions: SDS-based IGF-1 and IGFBP-3 enhance CPP diagnosis when used in predictive models, emphasizing the need for sex-specific interpretation and standardized reference intervals in real-world clinical practice.
Related Concept Videos
Signs of Puberty
Exponential Equations for Modeling Growth
Prediction Intervals
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y.
Estimating Population Standard Deviation

