Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 20, 2026

Bioelectric Analyses of an Osseointegrated Intelligent Implant Design System for Amputees
Published on: July 15, 2009
Reconstructive Strategies in Post-Traumatic Osteomyelitis of the Lower Limb: A Case Series and Surgical Algorithm
Marta Jagosz1, Piotr Węgrzyn1, Michał Chęciński1
1Department of Plastic and Hand Surgery, St. Jadwiga Śląska Hospital, 55-100 Trzebnica, Poland.
Abstract:
Background: Post-traumatic osteomyelitis (PTO) of the lower extremity is among the most demanding problems in orthoplastic reconstructive surgery. It typically follows open fractures, failed osteosynthesis, or implant infection. Effective management requires coordinated infection control, stable skeletal fixation, and timely vascularized soft-tissue coverage. Methods: We conducted a retrospective case series of 20 consecutive patients with PTO of the lower limb treated between 2021 and 2024 at a tertiary orthoplastic center. All patients underwent radical debridement, culture-directed intravenous antibiotic administration, and soft-tissue reconstruction using local muscle, fasciocutaneous, or free flaps; vascularized bone flaps were used to select nonunion cases. The primary outcomes were flap survival, complications, infection resolution, and limb salvage. Exploratory analyses included descriptive subgroup summaries by flap category. Results: Among 20 patients (15 men, 5 women; mean age 53.6 years), reconstructions included reverse/pedicled sural flaps (n = 9), hemisoleus muscle flaps (n = 7), medial gastrocnemius muscle flaps (n = 2), peroneus brevis muscle flaps (n = 2), and free flaps (n = 6), which comprised anterolateral thigh (ALT), medial femoral condyle (MFC) osteoperiosteal, deep circumflex iliac artery (DCIA) osteocutaneous, and radial forearm free flaps (RFFFs). Single-flap reconstructions were performed in 13 cases, whereas multistage/multiflap strategies were used in 7. Overall flap survival was 90%. Major flap complications comprised partial necrosis in two reverse sural flaps and one complete loss of a reverse sural flap; two patients had minor wound dehiscence. Infection resolved in 18/20 patients (90%; 95% CI ≈ 0.70-0.97). One patient requested below-knee amputation due to persistent nonunion associated with a pathological fracture. At a mean 10-month follow-up, all limb-salvaged patients were ambulatory. Conclusions: Effective reconstruction of PTO is improved by using a patient-specific algorithm that considers the defect location, vascular status, and host comorbidities. Local muscle and fasciocutaneous flaps remain dependable for most defects, with free or vascularized bone flaps reserved for composite or recalcitrant cases. Early referral to high-volume centers, radical debridement, and orthoplastic collaboration are critical for optimizing limb salvage. Our findings should be interpreted in light of the study's retrospective design and small sample size.

