Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 15, 2026

Porcine Liver Transplantation Without Veno-Venous Bypass As an Extended Criteria Donor Model
Published on: August 17, 2022
Outcomes in Asymptomatic Patients Undergoing Coronary Revascularization Before Liver Transplantation
Goyal Umadat1, Jennifer Lee2, Jordan C Ray1
1Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.
Insights
Pre-transplant percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) did not reduce major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in asymptomatic liver transplant (LT) candidates with severe coronary artery disease (CAD). Outcomes were similar whether patients received PCI or medical management before LT.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Transplantation Medicine
- Interventional Cardiology
Background:
- Coronary artery disease (CAD) is prevalent in liver transplantation (LT) candidates.
- The benefit of pre-transplant percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on post-LT outcomes is unclear.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate if pre-transplant PCI improves major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in asymptomatic LT candidates with severe CAD.
Main Methods:
- Single-center cohort study of 111 asymptomatic LT candidates with severe CAD (2005-2025).
- Compared outcomes between patients who underwent PCI (n=66) and those managed medically (n=45).
- Primary endpoint: MACE (myocardial infarction, stroke, new systolic dysfunction, post-LT revascularization, all-cause death).
Main Results:
- No significant difference in composite MACE between PCI and non-PCI groups (52% vs. 60%, p=0.40).
- PCI was not associated with MACE in Fine-Gray modeling.
- Independent predictors of MACE included prior myocardial infarction and pre-transplant dialysis.
Conclusions:
- Pre-transplant PCI is not associated with reduced post-LT MACE in asymptomatic LT candidates with severe CAD.
- Management decisions should consider other risk factors like prior MI and dialysis status.
Abstract:
Background: Coronary artery disease (CAD) is common among liver transplantation (LT) candidates, yet whether pre-transplant percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) improves post-LT outcomes remains uncertain. Methods: We conducted a single-center, Institutional Review Board-approved cohort study of adults undergoing LT from 2005 to 2025. Asymptomatic candidates with significant stenosis on invasive angiography were included; prior coronary artery bypass grafting was excluded. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE: myocardial infarction [MI], stroke/transient ischemic attack, new systolic dysfunction, post-LT coronary revascularization, or all-cause death). Results: Among 111 patients (median age 65 years; 84% male), 66 (59%) underwent PCI and 45 (41%) were managed medically. Over a median 32 months of follow-up, 61 patients (55%) experienced MACE. Composite MACE did not differ between PCI and non-PCI groups (52% vs. 60%, p = 0.40; log-rank p = 0.59). Fine-Gray modeling showed no association of PCI with MACE; independent predictors were prior MI (HR 1.81, 95% CI 1.01-3.24) and pre-transplant dialysis (HR 2.13, 95% CI 1.07-4.24). Major bleeding occurred in 7%. Matched and era-stratified analyses were concordant. Conclusions: In asymptomatic LT candidates with angiographically severe CAD, pre-LT PCI was not associated with a lower incidence of post-LT MACE.
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies

