Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 15, 2026

Author Spotlight: Studying the Impact of Maternal Dietary Deficiencies on Long-Term Offspring Health Outcomes
Published on: June 28, 2024
Effects of Infant Formula Type on Early Childhood Growth Outcomes: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Uzma Rani1, Roba Alwasila2, William T Story3
1Stead Family Department of Pediatrics, Division of General Pediatrics, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.
Insights
Non-standard infant formulas, like lactose-reduced or hydrolyzed types, show higher growth z-scores in infants during the first year compared to standard formulas. Further research is needed on long-term effects and obesity risk.
Area of Science:
- Pediatrics
- Nutrition Science
- Growth and Development
Background:
- Infant feeding practices significantly impact early childhood growth and development.
- Cow's milk-based infant formulas vary in composition, including standard, lactose-reduced, and hydrolyzed types.
- Understanding the differential effects of these formulas on growth is crucial for public health.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the effects of non-standard (lactose-reduced, hydrolyzed) cow's milk-based infant formulas versus standard formulas on infant growth.
- To assess growth outcomes in infants fed non-standard formulas, standard formulas, or breast milk.
- To identify potential differences in growth trajectories associated with various infant feeding types.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective cohort study of full-term infants with birth weight >2500 g.
- Data on infant formula type and breastfeeding status collected at 2-month visits.
- Growth outcomes (weight-for-age, length-for-age, BMI, weight-for-length z-scores) assessed at 12 and 24 months using WHO standards.
- Generalized linear mixed models used for statistical analysis, controlling for covariates.
Main Results:
- Infants fed non-standard formulas exhibited significantly higher weight-for-age, BMI, and weight-for-length z-scores at 12 months compared to standard formula users.
- These differences persisted for weight-for-age and BMI z-scores at 24 months.
- Both non-standard and standard formula groups showed significantly higher z-scores for multiple growth parameters compared to exclusively breastfed infants at both 12 and 24 months.
Conclusions:
- Non-standard infant formulas may influence infant growth differently than standard formulas, particularly in the first year of life.
- The findings suggest a potential impact on growth trajectories that warrants further investigation.
- Long-term health implications and the risk of obesity associated with non-standard formula use require additional research.
Abstract:
Objective: This study examines the effects of non-standard (lactose-reduced, hydrolyzed), cow-milk-based infant formulas on early childhood growth outcomes compared to standard formulas and breastfeeding. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included full-term infants with a birth weight >2500 g. Exposure and control data, including the type of infant formula [non-standard vs. standard] and breastfeeding status, were obtained at 2-month well visits. Growth outcomes (weight-for-age, length-for-age, BMI (Body Mass Index), and weight-for-length z-scores] were calculated using WHO (World Health Organization) growth standards at 1- and 2-year well visits. Generalized linear mixed models were used to evaluate associations between formula type and growth outcomes, adjusting for maternal, infant, and socioeconomic factors. Results: A total of 5515 infants were included in the final analysis. Feeding practices included exclusive breastfeeding (35%), standard formula (42%), and non-standard formula (23%). Infants fed non-standard formulas had significantly higher weight-for-age, BMI, and weight-for-length z-scores at 12 months than those fed standard formulas, and after controlling for other covariates, weight-for-age and BMI z-scores remained significantly higher in the non-standard formula infants. At 24 months, only weight-for-age z-scores remained significantly higher for non-standard formula users compared to standard formula users. Both non-standard and standard formula groups showed significantly higher weight-for-age, BMI, weight-for-length, and length-for-age z-scores compared to breastfed infants at 12 and 24 months. Conclusions: Non-standard infant formula may have a differential effect on growth during the first year of life compared to standard infant formula and breastfeeding. Future research should explore the long-term health effects of non-standard infant formula use and the risk of obesity.
Related Concept Videos
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Study Designs in Epidemiology
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
Nature and Nurture
Environmental Influences on Intelligence
Longitudinal Studies

