Effects of Infant Formula Type on Early Childhood Growth Outcomes: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Uzma Rani1, Roba Alwasila2, William T Story3

  • 1Stead Family Department of Pediatrics, Division of General Pediatrics, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.

Nutrients
|October 16, 2025
PubMed

Insights

Non-standard infant formulas, like lactose-reduced or hydrolyzed types, show higher growth z-scores in infants during the first year compared to standard formulas. Further research is needed on long-term effects and obesity risk.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatrics
  • Nutrition Science
  • Growth and Development

Background:

  • Infant feeding practices significantly impact early childhood growth and development.
  • Cow's milk-based infant formulas vary in composition, including standard, lactose-reduced, and hydrolyzed types.
  • Understanding the differential effects of these formulas on growth is crucial for public health.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the effects of non-standard (lactose-reduced, hydrolyzed) cow's milk-based infant formulas versus standard formulas on infant growth.
  • To assess growth outcomes in infants fed non-standard formulas, standard formulas, or breast milk.
  • To identify potential differences in growth trajectories associated with various infant feeding types.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective cohort study of full-term infants with birth weight >2500 g.
  • Data on infant formula type and breastfeeding status collected at 2-month visits.
  • Growth outcomes (weight-for-age, length-for-age, BMI, weight-for-length z-scores) assessed at 12 and 24 months using WHO standards.
  • Generalized linear mixed models used for statistical analysis, controlling for covariates.

Main Results:

  • Infants fed non-standard formulas exhibited significantly higher weight-for-age, BMI, and weight-for-length z-scores at 12 months compared to standard formula users.
  • These differences persisted for weight-for-age and BMI z-scores at 24 months.
  • Both non-standard and standard formula groups showed significantly higher z-scores for multiple growth parameters compared to exclusively breastfed infants at both 12 and 24 months.

Conclusions:

  • Non-standard infant formulas may influence infant growth differently than standard formulas, particularly in the first year of life.
  • The findings suggest a potential impact on growth trajectories that warrants further investigation.
  • Long-term health implications and the risk of obesity associated with non-standard formula use require additional research.

Related Concept Videos

Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
1.3K
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
404
Study Designs in Epidemiology01:20

Study Designs in Epidemiology

Epidemiological study designs are fundamental tools for investigating the distribution, determinants, and control of health conditions in populations. They help researchers understand the relationships between exposures and outcomes, and they broadly fall into two categories: "observational" and "experimental" studies.
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
878
Nature and Nurture01:10

Nature and Nurture

Many human characteristics, like height, are shaped by both nature—in other words, by our genes—and by nurture, or our environment. For example, chronic stress during childhood inhibits the production of growth hormones and consequently reduces bone growth and height. Scientists estimate that 70-90% of variation in height is due to genetic differences among individuals, and 10-30% of variation in height is due to differences in the environments that individuals experience,...
22.2K
Environmental Influences on Intelligence01:29

Environmental Influences on Intelligence

Despite the strong genetic influence on traits like intelligence, environmental factors significantly shape outcomes. For example, while over 90% of height variation is due to genetic differences, environmental factors such as nutrition also have a notable impact. Similarly, for intelligence, changes in a child's surroundings can significantly alter their IQ. Research shows that enriched environments boost children's academic success and help them develop key cognitive skills. Children...
881
Longitudinal Studies01:26

Longitudinal Studies

Longitudinal studies are also widely used in other medical and social science fields. For instance, in cardiovascular research, they can monitor patients' health over decades to identify risk factors for heart disease, such as high cholesterol or smoking, and evaluate the long-term effectiveness of preventive measures. Similarly, in mental health studies, researchers might follow individuals from adolescence into adulthood to understand the development and progression of conditions like...
473