Perioperative Outcomes in Robotic, Laparoscopic, and Open Distal Pancreatectomy: A Network Meta-Analysis and...

Distal pancreatectomy (DP) is a potentially curative procedure for tumors of the pancreatic body and tail. Minimally invasive DP (MIDP), including laparoscopic and robotic techniques, is increasingly being adopted. This study aimed to evaluate the perioperative outcomes of robotic DP (RDP) in comparison with laparoscopic and open approaches using a network meta-analysis and meta-regression.

We systematically searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Scopus for studies comparing at least two surgical approaches. Both Bayesian and frequentist network meta-analyses were performed.

Sixty-seven studies involving 18,113 patients met the inclusion criteria. Surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) analysis showed that RDP ranked first in 84.6% of measured parameters. Laparoscopic DP (LDP) demonstrated intermediate performance, whereas open DP (ODP) consistently ranked lowest. Operative time was significantly longer for RDP compared with ODP (MD = +25.93 min, 95% CI 7.68-44.18), while LDP and ODP were comparable. RDP significantly reduced 30-day mortality (OR = 0.37, 95% CI 0.16-0.84) and conversion rates compared with LDP (OR = 0.30, 95% CrI 0.22-0.40). Both minimally invasive approaches (RDP and LDP), compared with open surgery, were associated with reduced blood loss (-304 mL and -273 mL), fewer transfusions (OR 0.25 and 0.30), smaller transfused volumes (-1.98 and -1.86 units), shorter ICU stays (-4.0 and -2.3 days), fewer reinterventions (OR 0.45 and 0.56), and shorter hospital stays (-8.8 and -6.9 days), respectively.

Although associated with longer operative time, RDP appears safe and may confer significant advantages over both laparoscopic and open surgery, including reduced 30-day mortality, lower conversion rates, and improved perioperative outcomes, particularly when performed in high-volume, well-equipped centers.