Failure to Rescue After Surgery for Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis of Risk Factors...

Background: Failure to rescue (FTR), defined as death after major postoperative complications, is a critical quality indicator in pancreatic cancer surgery. Despite advances in surgical techniques and perioperative care, FTR rates remain high and vary across institutions. Methods: This systematic review uses a narrative synthesis followed by PRISMA 2020. A PubMed search (1992-2025) identified 83 studies; after screening, 52 studies (2010-2025) were included. Eligible designs were registry-based, multicenter, single-center, or prospective audits. Given substantial heterogeneity in study designs, FTR definitions, and outcome measures, a narrative synthesis was performed; no formal risk-of-bias assessment or meta-analysis was conducted. Results: Definitions of FTR varied (in-hospital, 30-day, 90-day, severity-based, and complication-specific cases). Reported rates differed by definition: average reported rates were 13.2% for 90-day CD ≥ III (G1); 10.3% for in-hospital/30-day CD ≥ III (G3); and 7.4% for 30-day "serious/major" morbidity (G8). Absolute differences were +3.0 and +2.9 percentage points (exploratory, descriptive comparisons). Five domains were consistently associated with lower FTR: (i) centralization to high-volume centers; (ii) safe adoption/refinement of surgical techniques; (iii) optimized perioperative management including early imaging and structured escalation pathways; (iv) patient-level risk stratification and prehabilitation; and (v) non-technical skills (NTSs) such as decision-making, situational awareness, communication, teamwork, and leadership. Among NTS domains, stress and fatigue management were not addressed in any included study. Limitations: Evidence is predominantly observational with substantial heterogeneity in study designs and FTR definitions; the search was limited to PubMed; and no formal risk-of-bias, publication-bias assessment, or meta-analysis was performed. Consequently, estimates and associations are descriptive/associative with limited certainty and generalizability. Conclusions: NTSs were rarely used or measured across the included studies, with validated instruments; quantitative assessment was uncommon, and no study evaluated stress or fatigue management. Reducing the FTR after pancreatic surgery will require standardized, pancreas-specific definitions of FTR, process-level rescue metrics, and deliberate strengthening of NTS. We recommend a pancreas-specific operational definition with an explicit numerator/denominator: numerator = all-cause mortality within 90 days of surgery; denominator = patients who experience major complications (Clavien-Dindo grade III-V, often labeled "CD ≥ 3"). Addressing the gaps in stress and fatigue management and embedding behavioral metrics into quality improvement programs are critical next steps to reduce preventable mortality after complex pancreatic cancer procedures.