Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 10, 2026

Therapy Interventions for Upper Limb Amputees Undergoing Selective Nerve Transfers
Published on: October 29, 2021
Is There an Association Between History of Intimate Partner Violence and Reported Health Outcomes After Orthopaedic
Miriyam Ghali1,2, Nicolette Ann Schurhoff1, William Cade1
1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine/Jackson Health System, Miami, FL, USA.
Patients with injuries who screened positive for intimate partner violence (IPV) reported lower health-related quality of life. This highlights the importance of IPV screening in orthopedic clinics for better patient outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic Surgery
- Public Health
- Trauma Care
Background:
- Intimate partner violence (IPV) affects a significant portion of the population, with musculoskeletal injuries being a common manifestation.
- Existing research on IPV is limited, particularly concerning diverse populations, men, and long-term patient-reported outcomes.
- There is a need to understand the impact of IPV on health-related quality of life in patients presenting with injuries.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine if patients screening positive for IPV after an injury report lower health-related quality of life compared to those screening negative.
- To investigate the utility of IPV screening tools in an orthopedic hand and upper extremity clinic setting.
- To assess the impact of IPV on specific domains of health-related quality of life.
Main Methods:
- A prospective study involving 500 patients with acute upper extremity injuries at an urban trauma hospital.
- Patients were screened for IPV using the Direct IPV and Extended Hurt, Insult, Threaten, Scream (E-HITS) tools.
- Health-related quality of life was assessed using the EQ-5D-3L survey, with data analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis tests, chi-square/Fisher exact tests, and logistic regression.
Main Results:
- Twenty-four percent (120 of 500) of patients screened positive for lifetime IPV.
- Patients screening positive for IPV reported significantly lower health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-3L scores) compared to those who screened negative (median 8.0 vs. 7.0, p=0.003).
- The difference in EQ-5D-3L scores surpassed the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) in mobility, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression subcategories for the IPV-positive group.
Conclusions:
- This study, conducted in a diverse, underserved population, demonstrates the effectiveness of standardized IPV screening tools.
- Patients disclosing IPV reported greater disability, with quality of life scores significantly impacted across multiple domains.
- Orthopaedic surgeons should consider prospective IPV screening for patients with upper extremity injuries to facilitate referrals and improve health outcomes.
More Related Videos
06:27Author Spotlight: Investigating Early Events and Long-Term Effects of ACL Injuries for Osteoarthritis Progression
Published on: September 29, 2023
07:06Block Building Task Identifies Distinct Groups of Left/Right-hand Choice Patterns After Unilateral Peripheral Nerve Injury
Published on: March 21, 2025