Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 15, 2026

Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke
Published on: January 7, 2019
Reducing patient burden of PROMs in healthcare through advanced computerized adaptive testing stopping rules
Michiel A J Luijten1,2,3,4,5, Benjamin D Schalet6, Leo D Roorda7
1Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychosocial Care, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Postbox 22660, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. m.luijten@amsterdamumc.nl.
Purpose:
Application of computerized adaptive testing (CAT) can improve the assessment of patient-reported health outcomes by reducing patient burden. We aimed to reduce patient burden of CATs further by optimizing a standard error reduction stopping rule (SER; minimum change in SE(θ) after each CAT step).
Methods:
We extracted PROMIS Anxiety and Depressive Symptoms CAT responses (mean age = 13.7, male = 50.3%) from the Dutch-Flemish PROMIS Assessment Center and estimated theta levels (θ) and standard errors (SE(θ)) for each step. The default stopping rules were a minimum/maximum of 4/12 items administered, respectively, or a minimum precision of SE(θ) < 0.32. We imposed increasing SER thresholds (0.01-0.20) and compared the following outcome criteria: mean efficiency of the CAT (Mefficiency; 1 - SE(θ)2/nitems), mean number of items administered (Mnitems), the mean SE(θ) of all respondents (MSE(θ)), and mean T-score difference compared to default stopping rules (M∆T).
Results:
Default stopping rules showed a mean efficiency of 0.88 and1.27, Mnitems = 9.98 and8.13, and MSE(θ) = 0.36 and0.38 for respectively the Anxiety and Depressive Symptoms item banks. We optimized the SER value with a differential efficiency function, resulting in shorter, more efficient CATs (Anxiety: mean efficiency = 1.08, Mnitems = 5.58, MSE(θ) = 4.24, M∆T = 0.04; Depressive Symptoms: mean efficiency = 1.45, Mnitems = 4.79, MSE(θ) = 4.15, M∆T = 0.58). For participants reporting no problems, this results in fewer items administered, but a decrease in measurement accuracy and biased T-scores, which may be relevant depending on the goal of assessment.
Conclusions:
We conclude that the current approach allows us to determine an optimal SER threshold that improves measurement efficiency, especially when floor/ceiling effects are present in the target population. The threshold values will vary depending on the θ distribution of the target population and the IRT model parameters.
More Related Videos
06:28E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
07:31Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
Published on: May 15, 2020