Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 15, 2026

Using the Visual World Paradigm to Study Sentence Comprehension in Mandarin-Speaking Children with Autism
Published on: October 3, 2018
Autistic juvenile defendants: How defendant race and offense type affect juror decisions
Kristina Baker1, Mia A Thomaidou2, Colleen M Berryessa2
1Department of Psychology, University of Southern Indiana.
Objective:
This study explores whether providing information about a juvenile defendant's autism spectrum disorder (ASD) diagnosis, the type of offense (violent/nonviolent), and their race influences laypersons' credibility evaluations and legal decisions (verdicts/sentencing).
Hypotheses:
We expected participants to render more not guilty verdicts and show leniency in sentencing when the defendant is White, has an ASD diagnosis, and is charged with a nonviolent offense. We anticipated credibility evaluations would mediate the relationships between ASD diagnosis and race, type of offense and sentencing views.
Method:
Using a mock-juror paradigm, 466 participants read a vignette in which the juvenile defendant's diagnosis (ASD + information vs. no diagnosis), race (White vs. Black), and the charged offense (violent vs. nonviolent) were experimentally manipulated.
Results:
Participants were highly unlikely to render guilty verdicts (p < .001, OR = 0.33) and harsh sentences (p < .001, ηp² = .11) when the defendant had an ASD diagnosis, even less so for violent offenses (p = .005, ηp² = .02). The defendant's likability (p < .001, ηp² = .04), honesty (p < .001, ηp² = .11), and believability (p < .001, ηp² = .09) were rated higher when the defendant had an ASD diagnosis, and these considerations led to significantly more lenient sentences compared to the no diagnosis condition. Participants were also twice as likely to find the White defendant guilty (p = .003, OR = 1.95) and reported being significantly more certain in their verdicts for the White defendant (p = .017, ηp² = .02).
Conclusions:
These results highlight the complex interplay between defendant characteristics and public perceptions of ASD in criminal legal proceedings. Findings highlight the need for judicial education, clearer guidelines on presenting ASD information in court, and further research on how race and neurodevelopmental diagnoses influence legal decisions. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Autism Spectrum Disorder
These core symptoms manifest differently among individuals, ranging from mild to severe. The disorder's complexity extends beyond its clinical presentation, encompassing a diverse range of biological, cognitive, and sociocultural influences.
Conduct Disorder
Learning Disabilities
Dyslexia
Dyslexia is a...
Oppositional Defiant Disorder
Diagnostic Criteria and...
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
Antisocial Personality Disorder
Behavioral Characteristics and...

