Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 6, 2026

Use of Rotorod as a Method for the Qualitative Analysis of Walking in Rat
Published on: December 10, 2008
The effects of RYSEN-induced supportive, propelling and impeding forces on step parameters and muscular control in
Sanne Ettema1,2, Tom J W Buurke1, Sina David3
1Department of Human Movement Sciences, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Background:
Body weight support (BWS) devices are increasingly used for gait training after stroke. The RYSEN not only allows for vertical BWS but also for the addition of mediolateral and anteroposterior forces. To assess to what extent the RYSEN could be used for targeted gait training, this study aimed to investigate the effect of BWS with and without the addition of mediolateral and anteroposterior forces on step parameters and muscular control in individuals after stroke and able-bodied individuals.
Methods:
In this cross-sectional study, fifteen individuals after stroke and fifteen able-bodied individuals completed several overground walking conditions: unsupported and BWS with(out) mediolateral and anteroposterior forces. Step length, step width (variability), single stance time and walking speed were determined using motion capture data. Muscular control was assessed using electromyography. Linear mixed-effect models were used to analyze the (interaction) effects of condition and group on step parameters. Statistical parametric mapping was used to analyze muscular control.
Findings:
Providing BWS led to increased speed and balance confidence in individuals after stroke, and caused decreased speed, step width variability and m. Gluteus Medius activity in able-bodied individuals. Adding mediolateral forces did not lead to additional changes. Adding anterior forces increased speed in individuals after stroke. Adding posterior forces slightly increased plantar flexor activity during push-off in able-bodied individuals.
Interpretation:
RYSEN BWS facilitates gait training at increased speed and balance confidence. Adding mediolateral or anteroposterior forces did not provide strong additional effects. Further research may determine how these forces can be better utilized during training.
More Related Videos
08:19Asymmetric Walkway: A Novel Behavioral Assay for Studying Asymmetric Locomotion
Published on: January 15, 2016
04:49Author Spotlight: Enhancing Post-Stroke Upper Limb Rehabilitation with Robotic Technologies for Improved Motor Recovery and Functional Outcomes
Published on: September 6, 2024