Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 15, 2026

Silencing of BRCA2 to Identify Novel BRCA2-regulated Biological Functions in Cultured Human Cells
Published on: August 12, 2015
Olaparib in Patients With Solid Tumors With BRCA1/2 Alterations: Results From The Targeted Agent and Profiling
Tareq Al Baghdadi1, Michael Rothe2, Pam K Mangat2
1Michigan Cancer Research Consortium, IHA Hematology Oncology, Ypsilanti, MI.
Purpose:
The Targeted Agent and Profiling Utilization Registry Study is a phase II basket trial evaluating the antitumor activity of targeted agents in patients with advanced cancer and genomic alterations. Results of five cohorts of patients with BRCA1/2-mutated solid tumors treated with olaparib are reported: breast cancer (BC), biliary tract cancer (BTC), lung cancer (LC), uterine cancer (UC), and other solid tumors (histology-pooled [HP]).
Methods:
Eligible patients had advanced tumors, measurable disease (RECIST), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-2, adequate organ function, and no standard treatment options. The primary end point was disease control (DC), defined as complete or partial response or stable disease (SD) of at least 16-weeks duration. For histology-specific cohorts, Simon two-stage design is based on a null DC rate of 15% versus 35% (power = 0.85; α = .10). Cohorts that were closed before achieving the planned stage II sample size were analyzed using a one-sided exact binomial test. For the HP cohort, the hypothesized null DC rate of 15% was rejected if the lower limit of a one-sided 90% CI was >15%. Secondary end points were objective response, progression-free survival, overall survival, duration of response or SD, and safety.
Results:
Patients with BC (n = 28), BTC (n = 19), LC (n = 25), UC (n = 15), or other advanced cancers (n = 32) with BRCA1/2 alterations were enrolled. The DC rates with one-sided 90% CI were 69% (55-100, P < .001), 50% (32-100, P = .0008), 41% (26-100, P = .0025), 47% (28-100, P = .0036), and 41% (29-100), respectively. The null hypothesized 15% DC rate was rejected for all cohorts. Thirty-six of 119 patients experienced treatment-related grade 3-4 adverse events (AEs) or serious AEs.
Conclusion:
Olaparib met prespecified criteria to declare a signal of activity in patients with various advanced BRCA1/2-altered solid tumors.
Insights
Olaparib demonstrated significant antitumor activity in patients with advanced solid tumors harboring BRCA1/2 mutations. This targeted therapy showed promising disease control rates across multiple cancer types, warranting further investigation.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Genomics
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- The Targeted Agent and Profiling Utilization Registry Study (TAPUR) is a phase II basket trial.
- Investigating targeted agents in advanced cancers with genomic alterations.
Purpose of the Study:
- Evaluate the antitumor activity of olaparib in patients with advanced solid tumors and BRCA1/2 mutations.
- Assess olaparib's efficacy across five distinct cancer cohorts: breast, biliary tract, lung, uterine, and other solid tumors.
Main Methods:
- Phase II basket trial design with five patient cohorts.
- Primary endpoint: disease control (DC) rate defined as complete response, partial response, or stable disease (SD) for at least 16 weeks.
- Utilized Simon two-stage design for histology-specific cohorts and a one-sided exact binomial test for smaller cohorts.
Main Results:
- Enrolled 119 patients with BRCA1/2-altered advanced solid tumors.
- Achieved significant disease control rates across all cohorts, exceeding the null hypothesis of 15% DC.
- Reported DC rates ranged from 41% to 69%, with notable efficacy in breast and biliary tract cancers.
Conclusions:
- Olaparib demonstrated a signal of clinical activity in patients with various advanced BRCA1/2-altered solid tumors.
- The study met its prespecified criteria for declaring efficacy.
- Results support olaparib as a potential targeted therapy for BRCA1/2-mutated solid malignancies.
Related Concept Videos
Treatment Resistant Cancers
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...
Cancer-Critical Genes II: Tumor Suppressor Genes
When the function of certain critical genes, especially those involved in cell cycle regulation and cell growth signaling cascades, gets disrupted, it upsets the cell cycle progression. Such cells with unchecked cell cycles start proliferating uncontrollably and eventually develop into tumors.
Such genes that act...
Cancer Therapies
However, cancer treatments can pose several challenges, as therapies used to kill cancer cells are generally also toxic to normal cells. Moreover, cancer cells mutate rapidly and can develop resistance to chemical agents or radiation therapy. Besides, all types of cancer cells may not respond to the same therapy. Some cancer cells respond to one...
mTOR Signaling and Cancer Progression
The mTOR pathway or the...

