Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 14, 2026

Diffuse Optical Spectroscopy for the Quantitative Assessment of Acute Ionizing Radiation Induced Skin Toxicity Using a Mouse Model
Published on: May 27, 2016
Quantitative next generation risk assessment for skin sensitization - application of regression models based on in
Isabelle Lee1, Mihwa Na2, Maura Lavelle1
1Research Institute for Fragrance Materials, Inc., 1200 MacArthur Blvd, Suite 306, Mahwah, NJ, USA.
Abstract:
Quantitative risk assessment (QRA) for dermal sensitization is essential for determining safe concentrations of skin sensitizers in consumer products. The fragrance industry developed the QRA2 approach, which uses the No Expected Sensitization Induction Level (NESIL) as a starting reference dose or point of departure (PoD). Animal alternatives for potency assessment have emerged to calculate quantitative PoDs. One such alternative is in vitro-based regression models. Herein, a framework for incorporating regression models into next-generation risk assessment (NGRA) is presented. The framework begins with hazard assessment using in vitro methods (OECD Guideline 497), followed by PoD calculation through regression models, and completed with QRA2. After determining a PoD, uncertainty factors may be considered to derive a new approach methodology NESIL (NAM-NESIL). Case studies are presented with two sensitizers, p-mentha-1,8-dien-7-al (CAS # 2111-75-3) and 3-propylidenephthalide (CAS # 17369-59-4), calculating acceptable exposure levels (AELs) for products like deodorants and bar soaps. Ratios of the AELs to consumer exposure levels (CELs) were then calculated to determine whether the current use is safe. Comparison of QRA based on NAM-NESILs to historically human-derived NESILs supports the reliability of in vitro models. This approach offers a promising alternative for PoD derivation, potentially eliminating the dependence on in-vivo data.
Related Concept Videos
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Mutagenicity and Carcinogenicity

