Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 14, 2026

Generation of Electronic Cigarette Aerosol by a Third-Generation Machine-Vaping Device: Application to Toxicological Studies
Published on: August 25, 2018
Electronic and conventional cigarette use and risk of spinal disc disorders: a nationwide cohort study
Jae Won Shin1, Ji-Won Kwon2, Sung Youn Chun3
1Department of Orthopedic Surgery, College of Medicine, Yonsei University, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, National Health Insurance Service, Ilsan Hospital, 100 Ilsan-ro, Ilsandong-gu, Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do 10444, Republic of Korea.
Background Context:
Liquid electronic cigarettes (LECs), heat-not-burn electronic cigarettes (HECs), and combustible cigarettes (CCs) pose varying disc disease risks.
Purpose:
To assess disc disease risk among LEC, HEC, combined LEC/HEC, and CC users and nonsmokers, including those transitioning from CCs to LECs or HECs.
Study Design/Setting:
This was an observational, nationwide, population-based retrospective cohort study using data from the Korean National Health Insurance Service.
Patient Sample:
Data from 3,265,293 adults in the Korean National Health Insurance Service database were analyzed.
Outcome Measures:
The primary study outcome was spinal disc disease hazard ratios.
Methods:
Participants were categorized as LEC, HEC, combined LEC/HEC or CC users or never-smokers. Propensity score matching and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression estimated adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) for disc disease risk. Smoking status was self-reported, and detailed quantitative exposure data were unavailable, which may limit interpretation of hazard ratios.
Results:
Increased disc disease risk was found in smokers than in nonsmokers: CC (aHR=1.174 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.158-1.191]), LEC (aHR=1.153 [95% CI, 1.079-1.232]), HEC (aHR=1.132 [95% CI, 1.063-1.204]), and combined LEC/HEC (aHR=1.174 [95% CI, 1.01-1.366]). Switching from CC to HEC reduced the risk compared to that after continuous CC use (aHR=0.89 [95% CI, 0.838-0.944]). However, the risk remained higher than that in nonsmokers (aHR=1.092 [95% CI, 1.026-1.163]). Switching from CC to LEC showed risk similar to that with continuous CC use (aHR=1.01 [95% CI, 0.902-1.132]) and higher risk than that in nonsmokers (aHR=1.339 [95% CI, 1.185-1.513]).
Conclusions:
CC smokers present the highest risk of spinal disc disease. LEC and HEC smokers have lower risks than CC smokers but higher risks than nonsmokers. Transitioning from CCs to HECs reduces disc disease risk, but switching to LECs does not, compared to continuous CC use.
More Related Videos
10:44Comparing the Effects of Electronic Cigarette Vapor and Cigarette Smoke in a Novel In Vivo Exposure System
Published on: May 24, 2017
09:30A Microcontroller Operated Device for the Generation of Liquid Extracts from Conventional Cigarette Smoke and Electronic Cigarette Aerosol
Published on: January 18, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Stimulants
Cocaine can be administered via snorting, injection, or smoking. It primarily functions by blocking the reuptake of dopamine, resulting in a euphoric high characterized by an intense sensation of happiness and...
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data