Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 14, 2026

A Minimally Invasive Model to Analyze Endochondral Fracture Healing in Mice Under Standardized Biomechanical Conditions
Published on: March 22, 2018
Biomechanical comparison of suture and screw fixation in PCL avulsion with variable bone quality
Sorawut Thamyongkit1, Pasit Komonsuwan1, Benrita Jitaree1
1Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Chakri Naruebodindra Medical Institute, Mahidol University, Bang Phli, Samut Prakan, Thailand.
None:
Various fixation techniques, including screws and suture-based methods, are used for posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) avulsion fractures. This study compared the biomechanical effects of different suture configurations in simulated PCL avulsion fractures. Twenty cadaveric knees were assigned to four fixation groups: antegrade screw (A), 1 suture tape with 2 tunnels (B), 2 suture tapes with 2 tunnels (C), and 2 suture tapes with 3 tunnels (D). Biomechanical testing included cyclic loading and load-to-failure tests, with elongation, stiffness, yield load, and failure modes recorded. No significant differences were found between groups (p > 0.05). Mean elongation ranged from 10.1 ± 2.9 mm (B) to 21.9 ± 15.9 mm (D), while mean yield load varied from 375.6 ± 110.9 N (C) to 428.6 ± 197.6 N (B). Fragment breakage was common in Groups A and D, while suture cut-through occurred in Groups B and C. Across all groups, bone mineral density (BMD) significantly correlated with yield load (r = 0.511, p = 0.021) and elongation (r = -0.553, p = 0.0110.Suture-based techniques provided comparable biomechanical performance to screws, and increasing suture tapes or tunnels did not enhance fixation strength. Bone quality should be considered when planning fixation and rehabilitation.
More Related Videos
09:07An Anesthesia, Surgery, and Harvest Method for the Evaluation of Transpedicular Screws Using an In Vivo Porcine Lumbar Spine Model
Published on: May 31, 2017
06:38Establishment of a Segmental Femoral Critical-size Defect Model in Mice Stabilized by Plate Osteosynthesis
Published on: October 12, 2016