Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 14, 2026

Fetal Echocardiography and Pulsed-wave Doppler Ultrasound in a Rabbit Model of Intrauterine Growth Restriction
Published on: June 29, 2013
Factors affecting the umbilical artery Doppler reference values in the second and third trimesters
Sophia Rahimi1,2, John C Kingdom1,3, Arietta Vayenas2
1Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Methodological factors, particularly estimated fetal weight (EFW) centile cut-offs, significantly impact umbilical artery pulsatility index (UA-PI) reference charts, contributing to observed heterogeneity in clinical interpretations.
Area of Science:
- Perinatal Medicine
- Fetal Physiology
- Medical Statistics
Background:
- Umbilical artery pulsatility index (UA-PI) is a key indicator of fetal well-being.
- Published UA-PI reference charts exhibit considerable heterogeneity, complicating accurate clinical interpretation.
- Methodological variations in chart construction are suspected contributors to this heterogeneity.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the influence of specific methodological factors on the variability of published UA-PI reference charts.
- To identify which factors, such as cohort characteristics and statistical modeling, contribute most to chart heterogeneity.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of a large dataset (25,069 UA-PI measurements from 12,394 pregnancies) from uncomplicated singleton pregnancies.
- Exploration of the impact of cohort characteristics: parity and estimated fetal weight (EFW) centile cut-offs.
- Assessment of the effect of different statistical modeling approaches for constructing UA-PI centile reference charts.
Main Results:
- The inclusion cut-off for EFW centiles significantly affected UA-PI centile values; higher cut-offs led to increased detection of elevated UA-PI.
- Charts using EFW >25th or 50th centiles identified more small-for-gestational-age fetuses with UA-PI >95th centile compared to charts using EFW >10th centile.
- Parity and statistical modeling methods had minimal impact on the resulting UA-PI reference charts.
Conclusions:
- The distribution of EFW centiles within the population used to create UA-PI reference charts is a major driver of heterogeneity.
- Clinical interpretation of UA-PI may vary significantly depending on the reference chart's construction methodology, particularly its EFW inclusion criteria.
Related Concept Videos
Assessing Blood pressure using a doppler ultrasound
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Doppler Ultrasound Blood Pressure Assessment:
Preparation of Equipment:
Fetal Circulation
Two umbilical arteries transport blood from the fetus to the placenta. At the placenta, the blood absorbs oxygen and nutrients while simultaneously eliminating waste products. This oxygen-enriched and nutrient-rich blood then returns to the fetus through one...
Special considerations while measuring blood pressure
Monitoring Both Arms:
Monitoring BP in both arms during the initial assessment is advisable, as the systolic value may differ by five to ten mm Hg between arms. For subsequent BP assessments, use the arm with the higher reading.
Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(two-step method)
Development of Blood Vessels
The initial formation of this system is facilitated by the small amount of yolk present in the ovum and yolk sac. Blood vessels originate from...
Peripheral Arterial Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Evaluation

