Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 14, 2026

Laparoscopic Anatomical Right Hemihepatectomy via the In Situ Anterior Approach
Published on: August 8, 2025
Exploring Treatments for Hepatic Epithelioid Hemangioendothelioma: A Subsegmental Bland Embolization Case Series With
John Cacciatore1, Neil Patel1, Stephanie Gonzalez1
1University of Miami - Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
Abstract:
IntroductionEpithelioid Hemangioendothelioma is a rare vascular neoplasm unresponsive to chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or immunotherapy. Surgical options are considered; however, recurrence rates reach up to 30%. Irreversible electroporation is difficult with large or numerous lesions. This paper reviews treatment options, exploring long-term response after subsegmental bland embolization of hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (HEHE).Case SeriesThis IRB approved retrospective study involved 3 patients after subsegmental bland embolization of 8 total HEHE lesions. Preoperative and postoperative contrast enhanced CT scans were compared up to 4 years post-operatively. Patient 1, a 28-year-old male whose single lesion involved segments 4, 5, and 8, with a mean volume of 458.1 mL that progressed despite treatment with Axitinib and Pembrolizumab. One-month postembolization volume was 439.6 mL and 4-year follow-up volume was 128.9 mL, representing a 72% volume reduction. The second patient, a 54-year-old female could not finish her IRE treatments. Four of the lesions, 2 right-sided and 2 left-sided, were treated with subsegmental bland embolization (mean volume 108.8 mL, SD 86.1 mL). The 1-month postembolization mean volume was 78.1 mL (SD 48.3 mL), and 4-years mean volume was 9.8 mL (SD 8.4 mL), representing a 91% tumor reduction volume. The third patient, a 61-year-old female presented with numerous, bilobar lesions not amenable to IRE. Three lesions were treated with subsegmental bland embolization (mean volume 52.4 mL, SD 55.9 mL). One-month postembolization, the mean volume was 49.9 (SD 49.5 mL). One-and-a-half-year follow-up demonstrated a mean volume of 38.8 mL (SD 48.9 mL), representing a 22% reduction in mean tumor volume. No grade 3 or greater complications after any procedure occurred.ConclusionsSubsegmental bland embolization is safe and effective, having the potential to stabilize HEHE not otherwise suitable for surgery or IRE. All patients achieved sustained disease control with most lesions demonstrating a partial response. Possible future directions include starting a prospective patient registry to obtain additional long-term data regarding subsegmental bland embolization outcomes.
More Related Videos
09:49Dual-phase Cone-beam Computed Tomography to See, Reach, and Treat Hepatocellular Carcinoma during Drug-eluting Beads Transarterial Chemo-embolization
Published on: December 2, 2013
09:52Isolated Hepatic Perfusion as a Treatment for Liver Metastases of Uveal Melanoma
Published on: January 25, 2015
Related Concept Videos
Esophageal Varices-II: Clinical Features and Management
In the initial assessment, a thorough review of the patient's medical history is vital to identify risk factors such as liver disease, alcohol...
Treatment for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Endothelin Receptor Antagonists
ETs are synthesized through a complex sequence of enzymatic steps, primarily involving an enzyme referred to as endothelin-converting enzyme...
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care