Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 14, 2026

Novel and Innovative Hybrid Technique for Type A Aortic Dissection
Published on: March 28, 2025
Early Experience of Physician-Modified Endografts for Total Aortic Arch Repair
Kathryn L DiLosa1, Agustin Sibona2, Rohini J Patel2
1University of California, Davis Medical Center, Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Sacramento, CA.
Background:
Medical and surgical comorbidities may present prohibitive risk for open surgical reconstruction of aortic arch pathology. Also, complex anatomy may preclude use of company-manufactured devices available in repair of aneurysmal aortic arch pathology. We sought to describe early experience with physician-modified endografts for management of aortic arch pathology.
Methods:
This was an institutional review board (IRB)-approved retrospective review of prospectively collected data among patients undergoing total endovascular aortic arch repair with a physician-modified endograft (PMEG) in conjunction with cardiothoracic surgery which was performed at a single institution between December 2020 and August 2024. Primary outcomes were technical success, stroke, and target vessel instability. Secondary outcomes included 30-day mortality, spinal cord ischemia, and reinterventions.
Results:
Nine patients underwent total endovascular repair of the aortic arch with proximal seal in zone 0, with 67% presenting needing urgent or emergent repairs. Repairs were completed using 3 retrograde branches in 3 patients (33%), 3 inner branches in one patient (11%), back-table fenestrations in 3 patients (33%), and laser in situ fenestration in one patient (11%), and the remaining repair was completed with a combination of back-table fenestration and laser in situ fenestration (11%). Technical success was achieved in 8 patients (89%), while access vessel rupture prevented repair in the final patient. With a mean follow-up of 150 days (122-208), there were no instances of target vessel instability observed. One patient suffered a stroke within 30 days (11%), one patient developed pneumonia (11%), and one patient developed bowel ischemia that required laparotomy with resection of necrotic bowel (11%). No patients developed spinal cord ischemia. Four patients died within 30 days of the index intervention (44%), all presenting with acute aortic rupture. Two patients required a reintervention (22%).
Conclusion:
PMEG for total endovascular arch repair presents a possible alternative to open surgical repair or existing company manufactured arch devices in selected patients. Perioperative stroke and mortality risk and rate of reintervention with total endovascular arch repair using a physician-modified device remain significant.

