Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 14, 2026

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
Published on: September 27, 2019
Implementation Strategies Applied in Communities Matching Process (ISAC Match): Expanded Guidance and Case Study
Laura E Balis1, Taren Massey-Swindle2,3,4, Shelly Palmer5
1Center for Nutrition & Health Impact, Omaha, NE, USA. lbalis@centerfornutrition.org.
Background:
Implementation strategies are methods or techniques to improve the adoption, implementation, sustainment, and scale-up of evidence-based interventions. Limited guidance exists on feasible processes for selecting and tailoring implementation strategies in community (non-clinical) settings. The Implementation Strategies Applied in Communities (ISAC) compilation includes a pragmatic matching process to accompany the compilation (ISAC Match). This study expands on ISAC Match by providing additional detail and potential approaches to complete the four-step matching process, including a case study from work in a state Cooperative Extension System. IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES APPLIED IN COMMUNITIES MATCHING PROCESS (ISAC MATCH): ISAC Match is intended to be applied within integrated research-practice partnerships or similar models. Before beginning the ISAC Match process, participants should have identified a new or existing evidence-based intervention they are interested in integrating (or improving the integration of) and have the power and scope to influence implementation. ISAC Match includes four steps: 1) reviewing available information on evidence-based intervention integration and conducting contextual inquiry, if needed, to understand barriers and facilitators; 2) identifying existing implementation strategies used in the implementing organization, 3) using recommended guidance tools to select relevant implementation strategies to overcome barriers and capitalize on facilitators; and 4) tailoring strategies to fit within the setting they will be used in. These steps are completed with health equity considerations in mind to ensure that implementation strategies are designed to improve adoption, implementation, and maintenance in ways that seek to narrow existing health disparities. To illustrate the use of ISAC Match, this study applied the four-step ISAC Match process to select and tailor implementation strategies to increase Montana State University Extension Agents' adoption of built environment approaches that facilitate physical activity.
Conclusions:
The ISAC match process was developed to apply to community settings because of a lack of guidance on rapid, relevant methods for selecting and tailoring implementation strategies to overcome barriers and capitalize on facilitators. Future work is needed to determine whether the ISAC match process is more efficient and whether results are more impactful than other matching processes that are less specific to community settings.
More Related Videos
08:53Integrating Computerized Linguistic and Social Network Analyses to Capture Addiction Recovery Capital in an Online Community
Published on: May 31, 2019
06:05The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
Published on: February 19, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Community Based Intervention
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Case Studies
SBAR II: Application of SBAR
SBAR Report from a Nurse to a Health Care Provider
S: "Hello, Dr. Smith. This is Jane, RN, from the Med Surg unit. I am calling to tell you about Ms. White in Room 210, who is experiencing increased pain and redness at her incision site. Her recent...
Persuasion Strategies