Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 6, 2026

Author Spotlight: UAV Remote Sensing for Efficient Invasive Plant Biomass Estimation
Published on: February 9, 2024
Comparing parametric and nonparametric approaches for estimating forage availability using remote sensing and
Sajad Alimahmoodi Sarab1, Farajollah Tarnian2, Ebrahim Karimi Sangchini3
1Forests and Rangelands Research Department, Khuzestan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center (AREEO), Ahvaz, Iran. sajadali9@yahoo.com.
Abstract:
Accurate estimation of forage availability is crucial for effective rangeland management. This study, conducted in a hot semi-arid rangeland (844.7 ha) in Khuzestan province, Iran, outlines a three-step approach to achieve this goal. Forage availability was measured using the cutting and weighing method on 58 one-square-meter sample plots. Initially, remote sensing (Sentinel-2) and climatic indicators were prepared, and the Pearson correlation coefficient was employed to analyze relationships between these independent variables and the dependent variable (forage mass). The second step focused on identifying optimal vegetation indices for forage availability estimation using multiple linear regression (MLR), Random Forest (RF), and classification and regression trees (C&RT) algorithms. The third step aimed to enhance model performance by integrating vegetation and climatic indices. Using 58 sample plots, 30 were used for modeling and 28 exclusively for final validation. A k-fold cross-validation (k = 5) was employed, with 47 plots for training and 11 for validation in each iteration. Model performance (MLR, RF, C&RT) was evaluated using average R2 and RMSE metrics from all validation folds, ensuring robust and reliable results. The Random Forest used an internal 60-20-20 split. Correlation analysis revealed that MSAVI2 (-0.83), SAVI (-0.23), DVI (-0.17), potential evapotranspiration index (-0.42), and Transou index (0.35) were the most significant variables. In the second step, R2 values for MLR, RF, and C&RT models were 0.54, 0.54, and 0.68, respectively. Incorporating potential evapotranspiration and Transou indices into the models boosted their coefficients of determination to 0.68, 0.72, and 0.91, with corresponding RMSE reductions of 85%, 69%, and 22%. The study concludes that a combination of the MSAVI2 index with potential evapotranspiration and Transou indices, implemented through the non-parametric C&RT regression, offers a robust method for estimating rangeland forage availability in hot, semi-arid, and arid environments.
More Related Videos
12:26Integrating Remote Sensing with Species Distribution Models; Mapping Tamarisk Invasions Using the Software for Assisted Habitat Modeling SAHM
Published on: October 11, 2016
09:04Leaf Area Index Estimation Using Three Distinct Methods in Pure Deciduous Stands
Published on: August 29, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data
Parametric statistics, as the name suggests, assumes that data follow a specific distribution, often a normal distribution. This assumption enables robust hypothesis testing and estimation. Parametric methods, like the Student's t-test or Goodness-of-fit test, are frequently employed in biostatistics due to their robustness. For instance,...
Light Acquisition
Introduction to Nonparametric Statistics
One of...
Key Elements for Plant Nutrition
Responses to Drought and Flooding
Statistical Methods to Analyze Parametric Data: ANOVA
One-way ANOVA is applied when a single independent variable or factor is scrutinized. It compares...