Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 14, 2026

Microfluidic Flow Chambers Using Reconstituted Blood to Model Hemostasis and Platelet Transfusion In Vitro
Published on: March 19, 2016
Measurement Uncertainty in the Hemostasis Laboratory
1Cambridge Haemophilia and Thrombophilia Centre, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Measurement uncertainty (MU) quantifies variability in clinical lab results. This review examines MU implementation in hemostasis testing, comparing methods for accuracy and feasibility.
Area of Science:
- Clinical laboratory science
- Metrology
- Analytical chemistry
Background:
- Clinical laboratory results exhibit inherent variability.
- Measurement uncertainty (MU) is a framework to quantify this variability for accurate clinical interpretation.
- In hemostasis assays, MU is crucial for result comparison within and between patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the implementation of different measurement uncertainty (MU) approaches in hemostasis laboratories.
- To assess the applicability of the ISO/TS 20914:2019 standard in specialist areas like hemostasis.
- To explore the balance between statistical rigor and operational feasibility in MU estimation.
Main Methods:
- Review of existing metrological frameworks for MU estimation, including the Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (GUM).
- Analysis of the ISO/TS 20914:2019 technical specification for a top-down MU approach.
- Exploration of challenges and considerations for implementing MU in hemostasis testing.
Main Results:
- The GUM provides a statistically rigorous but complex method for MU estimation.
- ISO/TS 20914:2019 offers a more operationally feasible top-down approach, supporting ISO 15189 compliance.
- Applicability of ISO/TS 20914:2019 to specialist fields like hemostasis requires further investigation.
Conclusions:
- Implementing MU in hemostasis laboratories involves navigating complex metrological frameworks.
- The ISO/TS 20914:2019 standard presents a promising, feasible approach but needs validation in specialized areas.
- Effective MU implementation enhances the reliability and interpretability of hemostasis test results.
More Related Videos
09:38A Microfluidic Flow Chamber Model for Platelet Transfusion and Hemostasis Measures Platelet Deposition and Fibrin Formation in Real-time
Published on: February 14, 2017
08:44An In Vitro Hemodynamic Loop Model to Investigate the Hemocytocompatibility and Host Cell Activation of Vascular Medical Devices
Published on: August 21, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision
Uncertainty: Overview
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring
Several factors...
Random and Systematic Errors
Contaminants and Errors
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...