Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Rational Dosage Regimen: Maintenance Dose and Loading Dose01:24

Rational Dosage Regimen: Maintenance Dose and Loading Dose

5.3K
A rational dosage regimen considers a drug's pharmacokinetics, including its absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination from the body. By understanding these factors, the appropriate dosage can be determined, and the dosing schedule can be designed to achieve and maintain the desired therapeutic effect while minimizing adverse effects.
In most cases, drugs are administered repetitively or infused continuously to maintain a steady-state concentration in the body. At a steady...
5.3K
Dosage Regimen: Multiple Oral Dosage01:25

Dosage Regimen: Multiple Oral Dosage

226
Understanding how a drug's concentration fluctuates within the body over time is crucial in pharmacokinetics, particularly with multiple oral doses. A graphical representation of multiple oral dosages provides insight into these dynamics. Typical accumulation curves of a drug's concentration in the body reveal a sawtooth pattern, indicating periodic peaks and troughs correlating with each dose administration and the drug's subsequent elimination.The plasma concentration at any time during an...
226
Determination of Multiple Dosing Parameters: Loading and Maintenance Doses01:25

Determination of Multiple Dosing Parameters: Loading and Maintenance Doses

218
A loading dose is an essential pharmacological strategy to rapidly achieve the target plasma drug concentration necessary for an immediate therapeutic effect. This approach is especially critical for drugs characterized by slow absorption or extended half-lives, where delaying therapeutic plasma levels could compromise treatment outcomes. By administering a loading dose, clinicians ensure a prompt onset of drug action, even for agents with complex pharmacokinetic profiles.Achieving steady-state...
218
Dosage Regimen: Fixed Dose01:01

Dosage Regimen: Fixed Dose

2.3K
Fixed-dose regimens are a common approach to administer drugs to achieve and maintain desired levels of the drug in the body. In this dosing strategy, a specific amount of medication is given at regular intervals, often multiple times a day, to ensure a consistent drug concentration in the bloodstream.
Fixed-dose regimens can be used for various routes of administration, including intravenous (IV) injections and oral medications. For IV administration, a predetermined amount of the drug is...
2.3K
Antiasthma Drugs: Mast Cell Stabilizers and Anti-IgE Drugs01:25

Antiasthma Drugs: Mast Cell Stabilizers and Anti-IgE Drugs

1.7K
Asthma is a chronic respiratory condition for which new therapeutic avenues, including anti-inflammatory drugs like mast cell stabilizers and anti-IgE treatments, continue to be developed.
Mast cell stabilizers, such as cromolyn (also known as sodium cromoglycate) and nedocromil (Tilade), are effective drugs in asthma management. These stabilizers hinder histamine release by skillfully obstructing the activation of mast cells and other cellular entities. Notably, they navigate this task without...
1.7K
Asthma-IV: Nursing Management01:30

Asthma-IV: Nursing Management

3.7K
The nursing management of asthma is a comprehensive approach that relies heavily on the expertise and dedication of healthcare professionals. It involves thorough assessment, accurate diagnosis, strategic planning, effective implementation, and diligent evaluation. By meticulously following this step-by-step process, healthcare professionals play a crucial role in providing the best possible care and treatment for patients with asthma, enhancing their overall health and well-being.
First, in...
3.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Publisher Correction: Reporting pediatric randomized trials: why SPIRIT-C 2026 and CONSORT-C 2026 matter now.

Pediatric research·2026
Same author

Intergenerational psychosocial stress as an allergic disease modulator.

Pediatric research·2026
Same author

Preexisting Humoral Immunity Against Seasonal Coronaviruses Enhances Antibody Responses on SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination.

Open forum infectious diseases·2026
Same author

Early identification of delayed-onset ADA deficiency: The case for expanded first-tier newborn screening.

Journal of human immunity·2026
Same author

Reporting pediatric randomized trials: why SPIRIT-C 2026 and CONSORT-C 2026 matter now.

Pediatric research·2026
Same author

Age-Appropriate Low Dosing for Food Protein-Induced Enterocolitis Syndrome Oral Food Challenges: Proposing a Standardized Approach.

The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 14, 2026

Basophil Activation Test for Allergy Diagnosis
07:22

Basophil Activation Test for Allergy Diagnosis

Published on: May 31, 2021

9.3K

Peanut Oral Immunotherapy Using 30 and 300 mg Maintenance Doses.

Julia E M Upton1, Diana Toscano Rivero2, Danbing Ke3

  • 1Division of Immunology and Allergy, Department of Pediatrics, University of Toronto, SickKids Research Institute, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Translational Medicine Program, SickKids Research Institute, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Institute of Medical Sciences, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. in Practice
|October 18, 2025
PubMed
Summary

A low-dose (30 mg) peanut oral immunotherapy (P-OIT) regimen safely and effectively increased peanut protein tolerance in children. This dose was comparable to a higher dose (300 mg) and resulted in fewer adverse events, suggesting a simpler, safer treatment option.

Keywords:
Low dosePeanut allergyPeanut oral immunotherapy

More Related Videos

Antigenic Liposomes for Generation of Disease-specific Antibodies
10:31

Antigenic Liposomes for Generation of Disease-specific Antibodies

Published on: October 25, 2018

12.8K
Self-Administration of Drugs in Mouse Models of Feeding and Obesity
03:37

Self-Administration of Drugs in Mouse Models of Feeding and Obesity

Published on: June 8, 2021

5.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 14, 2026

Basophil Activation Test for Allergy Diagnosis
07:22

Basophil Activation Test for Allergy Diagnosis

Published on: May 31, 2021

9.3K
Antigenic Liposomes for Generation of Disease-specific Antibodies
10:31

Antigenic Liposomes for Generation of Disease-specific Antibodies

Published on: October 25, 2018

12.8K
Self-Administration of Drugs in Mouse Models of Feeding and Obesity
03:37

Self-Administration of Drugs in Mouse Models of Feeding and Obesity

Published on: June 8, 2021

5.1K

Area of Science:

  • Allergy and Immunology
  • Pediatric Allergy
  • Food Immunotherapy

Background:

  • The optimal low-dose for peanut oral immunotherapy (P-OIT) remains undetermined.
  • Investigating very low-dose P-OIT is crucial for developing safer and more accessible treatment protocols.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the safety and efficacy of a very low-dose (30 mg) P-OIT in increasing tolerated peanut protein (PP) doses.
  • To evaluate the immunologic changes induced by very low-dose P-OIT.
  • To compare the outcomes of 30 mg P-OIT with a 300 mg dose and a strict avoidance group.

Main Methods:

  • A prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study involving peanut-allergic children.
  • Participants were assigned to receive P-OIT with 30 mg or 300 mg maintenance doses, or open-label avoidance.
  • Efficacy was measured by comparing cumulative tolerated doses of PP (≥443 mg and ≥1,043 mg) via double-blind placebo-controlled food challenges (DBPCFC) at one year. Safety and specific IgE/IgG4 levels were also assessed.

Main Results:

  • In the 30 mg P-OIT group, 13/17 patients tolerated ≥443 mg PP and 7/17 tolerated ≥1,043 mg PP, significantly higher than the avoidance group (P < .001).
  • The 30 mg group showed comparable efficacy to the 300 mg group in increasing tolerated PP doses, with significantly fewer systemic adverse events.
  • Immunologic markers (specific IgE and IgG4) improved similarly in both P-OIT groups compared to the avoidance group.

Conclusions:

  • A 30 mg maintenance dose of P-OIT is effective in significantly increasing the threshold for peanut protein tolerance compared to strict avoidance.
  • This low-dose regimen appears clinically similar to a 300 mg dose, offering a potentially simplified and safer immunotherapy approach.
  • The 30 mg dose may lead to fewer treatment dropouts and improved patient adherence due to its safety profile.